Observed in a bookshop.
Tulip mania
But at least there’s no financial downside to my addiction to these beautiful flowers.
Rich pickings under Labour
From The Observer this morning…
The rich have prospered under New Labour, and the top 10 per cent of adults now take home 40 per cent of the all the income earned in Britain, according to new analysis by the authoritative Institute for Fiscal Studies.
Despite a battery of redistributive policies enacted by Gordon Brown in his decade as Chancellor to boost the incomes of the poorest in society, the bumper sums earned in the City as the equity markets boomed have helped to keep those at the top moving ahead…
Hmm… I bet they will do even better under Cameron.
Verily, it is written that Apple selleth the Air
This morning’s Observer column…
It’s that time of year again. Last week the Church of Apple Resurgent gathered in San Francisco for its annual congregation. The faithful were granted an audience with the Blessed Steve Jobs, who revealed unto them what miracles he had wrought since they were last gathered together. First, he showed them a Time Capsule, which can bring back the past and preserve memories of days gone by…
Xbox Live is not dead, just half-alive
The really puzzling thing about the continuing problems with Microsoft’s XBox Live service is why the company apparently is unable to get a grip on the situation. After all, if Microsoft aspires to get into ‘cloud’ computing, then it’s got to be able to handle volume. And that’s what it clearly has been unable to do over the recent Christmas period.
If Microsoft wants to rev up the online business generated from its Live strategy, it didn’t engender a lot of confidence among customers in recent weeks. The Xbox Live online service suffered outages and intermittent service for almost two weeks and even the Zune marketplace shut down temporarily.
The outage began Dec. 22 — the Saturday before the week of Christmas — and continued through the end of the year.
High traffic levels seem a likely suspect for the problems, which may have been exacerbated by high traffic stemming from new users beginning on Christmas Day…
Er, I write with feeling about this, not because I’m an online gamer, but because some of the younger members of my household are!
Facebook: an elegy
Photo by avixyz.
Martin Weller has some interesting valedictory thoughts about Facebook.
This will be the year Facebook fades away for many of us. It won’t disappear – I’ll probably have a Facebook profile still, but I just won’t use it much, rather like I have a LinkedIn profile that I never do anything with. So, before it goes and we become all dismissive about it, here are some of the good things the Facebook experience taught me…
It’s an interesting list, so go read the entire post.
Social networking in education
The third of the Economist’s online debates is on the proposition that “social networking technologies will bring large [positive] changes to educational methods, in and out of the classroom”. Martin posted this comment:
In some ways the argument is irrelevant – it’s like asking ‘is alcohol beneficial to study?’ You could argue either way, but regardless of what we think students are going to use it anyway. But, that aside, let’s look at what SNS offer – a sense of community, peer support, enthusiastic users, engagement with technology, resource sharing, democratic participation – hmm, these are all things we’ve been desperate to have in higher education for years. We’ve largely failed in many of these (as anyone who uses a VLE can attest), so why wouldn’t we look at what happens in SNs? It would be remiss of us not to do so. However, there are some _big_ cultural issues that higher ed will need to get over – in particular HE is based on a very hierarchical model, and is often obsessed with controlling the student experience. In a social network you have to let go. In short you have to accept bottom up over top down – and that will be tough, as it goes against 3000 years of educational instinct. So, my conclusion – of course higher education should try and adopt principles of social networks and 2.0, but the question is whether it _can_. My two-pennyworth was: Technology is not the key factor in any of this. Many years ago Seymour Papert believed that putting computers into primary schools would revolutionise learning and education. It didn’t — mainly because giving pupils the capacity to engage in computer-mediated exploratory learning would have undermined the authority of teachers and made schools more ‘difficult’ to manage. So the school system asserted control over the technology and placed it in roped-off spaces called ‘ICT Rooms’ or the like, and Papert’s hoped-for revolution didn’t happen. There’s an analogy here for social networking. It’s intrinsically non-hierarchical and largely uncontrollable. It’s therefore a poor fit with our hierarchical and tightly-controlled educational institutions — at every level from kindergarten to university. Social networking could conceivably have beneficial effects in education — but only > > If the social structures implicit in our educational system adapt to accept it. This same tension between institutional control and technological potential is evident in the way learning resources, including worksheets, have been integrated into education. Rather than leveraging technology to foster independent, exploratory learning, many schools have opted to digitize traditional materials without fundamentally rethinking how they engage students. The real challenge isn’t the availability of technology but the willingness of educational structures to embrace more flexible, student-centered approaches. Until institutions prioritize adaptability over rigid control, innovation in educational materials will remain surface-level rather than transformative.
However, within these constraints, resources like K-12 printable worksheets continue to serve as valuable tools for structured learning. They provide teachers with adaptable content that can be used in both traditional and digital formats while maintaining a sense of familiarity in the classroom. When designed thoughtfully, these worksheets encourage critical thinking and engagement, ensuring that students remain active participants in their education rather than passive recipients of information. The key lies not in replacing traditional methods entirely but in integrating them in ways that allow students more agency in their learning journey. One innovative approach to blending traditional and modern learning is through educational word search puzzles. These puzzles challenge students to recognize patterns, build vocabulary, and sharpen cognitive skills, all while keeping them actively engaged. Unlike rigid worksheets, word searches encourage problem-solving and critical thinking, as students must navigate a grid to find hidden words. Integrating these puzzles into classroom activities can enhance both language acquisition and analytical abilities, fostering a hands-on approach to learning. Educational word search puzzles can be particularly effective when customized to fit specific lesson plans. By creating themed puzzles, teachers can reinforce key concepts while adding an element of fun to the classroom. Platforms like https://wordsearchhero.com offer customizable puzzles that cater to various subjects and grade levels, allowing educators to seamlessly incorporate them into the curriculum. When used thoughtfully, these puzzles become more than just a pastime—they transform into interactive learning tools that encourage student participation and intellectual curiosity.
Portrait of the artist on the way down
Well, in a lift/elevator anyway.
Has AT&T lost its marbles?
Tim Wu has an intriguing piece in Slate Magazine in which he ponders the implications of AT&T’s announcement that it is seriously considering plans to examine all the traffic it carries for potential violations of U.S. intellectual property laws. (A similar idea is about to be foisted on UK ISPs by Gordon Broon & Co.)
“No one knows exactly what AT&T is proposing to build”, he writes. “But if the company means what it says, we’re looking at the beginnings of a private police state. That may sound like hyperbole, but what else do you call a system designed to monitor millions of people’s Internet consumption? That’s not just Orwellian; that’s Orwell.”
That’s just the civil libertarian aspect of the idea. The interesting thing is that the commercial downsides could be catastrophic — for AT&T.
The most serious problems for AT&T may be legal. Since the beginnings of the phone system, carriers have always wanted to avoid liability for what happens on their lines, be it a bank robbery or someone’s divorce. Hence the grand bargain of common carriage: The Bell company carried all conversations equally, and in exchange bore no liability for what people used the phone for. Fair deal.
AT&T’s new strategy reverses that position and exposes it to so much potential liability that adopting it would arguably violate AT&T’s fiduciary duty to its shareholders. Today, in its daily Internet operations, AT&T is shielded by a federal law that provides a powerful immunity to copyright infringement. The Bells know the law well: They wrote and pushed it through Congress in 1998, collectively spending six years and millions of dollars in lobbying fees to make sure there would be no liability for “Transitory Digital Network Communications”—content AT&T carries over the Internet. And that’s why the recording industry sued Napster and Grokster, not AT&T or Verizon, when the great music wars began in the early 2000s.
Here’s the kicker: To maintain that immunity, AT&T must transmit data “without selection of the material by the service provider” and “without modification of its content.” Once AT&T gets in the business of picking and choosing what content travels over its network, while the law is not entirely clear, it runs a serious risk of losing its all-important immunity. An Internet provider voluntarily giving up copyright immunity is like an astronaut on the moon taking off his space suit. As the world’s largest gatekeeper, AT&T would immediately become the world’s largest target for copyright infringement lawsuits….
Tim Wu is a great commentator on this stuff, and this is an especially good piece.
The essential accessory for the new MacBook Air
You have to see the Jobs Keynote to appreciate the joke.
Thanks to Michael and Laura for the link.