Facing up to one’s responsibilities

I’m not a fan of the French President, and became even more irritated by his antics down the road on vacation in Cap Negré, where he’s been running a kind of holiday camp for chopper-ferried celebs like U2’s Bono. But at least he knew what to do when ten French paras were killed in Afghanistan. First he interrupted his holiday by flying out to see the troops, and then he was in Les Invalides at 11.30am yesterday for the ceremony to honour the returning dead. Compare that with the fact that Tony Blair never turned up at Brize Norton to greet the coffins of soldiers he had consigned to battle. Or the way that George Bush has always studiously avoided any public encounter with his returning casualties.

The political Olympics

Tom Friedman on the Georgian mess

If the conflict in Georgia were an Olympic event, the gold medal for brutish stupidity would go to the Russian prime minister, Vladimir Putin. The silver medal for bone-headed recklessness would go to Georgia’s president, Mikheil Saakashvili, and the bronze medal for rank short-sightedness would go to the Clinton and Bush foreign policy teams…

Hmmm… Not quite. The Gold goes to Saakashvili IMHO.

So what’s new?

This is the time of year when US News & World Report publishes its list of the ‘top’ US universities. And guess what? Harvard comes out top, followed by Princeton, Yale and MIT & Stanford tying for fourth place. Average annual fees for the top five = $35,636.60. Just thought you’d like to know.

Hype Cycle 2008

One of the most useful analytical devices I’ve ever encountered when lecturing about new technology is the Gartner Hype Cycle.

Here’s the one for 2008 (courtesy of TechCrunch).

Bird brains

Ever wondered why magpies are obsessed with bright, reflective objects? New Scientist has a video suggesting an explanation.

The joy of text

I’m re-reading (after a gap of perhaps 20 years), Vladimir Nabokov’s autobiography. I’d forgotten how good it is: simply ravishing. I keep annoying my companions by reading passages to them. Passages like this description of his Swiss governess:

A large woman, a very stout woman, Mademoiselle rolled into our existence in December 1905 when I was six and my brother five. There she is. I see so plainly her abundant dark hair, brushed up high and covertly graying; the three wrinkles on her austere forehead; her beetling brows; the steely eyes behind the black-rimmed pince-nez; that vestigial mustache; that blotchy complexion, which in moments of wrath develops an additional flush in the region of the third, and amplest, chin so regally spread over the frilled mountain of her blouse. And now she sits down, or rather she tackles the job of sitting down, the jelly of her jowl quaking, her prodigious posterior, with the three buttons on the side, lowering itself warily; then, at the last second, she surrenders her bulk to the wicker armchair, which, out of sheer fright, bursts into a salvo of crackling.

Watching Nabokov handling the English language is like watching a Rostropovich handling a cello; effortless mastery. I think I have a pretty wide vocabulary, but I’m being driven to consult dictionaries just to check that he isn’t having me on. Page 28, for instance, required three separate checks — of ‘fatidic’, ‘hypnagogic’ and ‘palpebral’. Speak Memory! isn’t for speed readers. But if you like seeing a genius at the top of his game, it’s a delight.