Quote of the day

In the days that follow look at our airports, look at our sea ports and look at our railway stations and, even after your cowardly attack, you will see that people from the rest of Britain, people from around the world will arrive in London to become Londoners and to fulfil their dreams and achieve their potential. They choose to come to London, as so many have come before because they come to be free, they come to live the life they choose, they come to be able to be themselves. They flee you because you tell them how they should live. They don’t want that and nothing you do, however many of us you kill, will stop that flight to our city where freedom is strong and where people can live in harmony with one another. Whatever you do, however many you kill, you will fail.

London’s Mayor, Ken Livingstone.

The Piccadilly line

An observant friend, having read my musings on the bombings, writes:

You might note two minor things.

1. Piccadilly line going East has lots of Heathrow people on (ie lots of luggage). [So an abandoned package would not be noticed as quickly.] My guess is that bomber got off at Holborn (Russell Square has a very deep lift, as does Covent Garden) having activated the device.

2. Death toll higher than Edgware Road or Liverpool Street as blast more lethal in confined space.

Random thoughts on the London bombings

In no particular order…

* Most of the fatalities occurred on the Piccadilly tube line between King’s Cross station and Russell Square. This happens to be the line I invariably use when I come to London.

* On Tuesday evening, I was one of the invited participants at a seminar in LSE on media and the reporting of terrorism. The seminar was conducted under the Chatham House Rule, which dictates that while one can write about what was discussed, one cannot reveal who said what. Participants included some very senior government officials and experienced journalists specialising in security issues. The discussion was pretty sombre, much of it focussed on the difficulty of practising responsible journalism in an area where it’s often impossible to verify or corroborate what security authorities say about terrorist threats. A key issue, some felt, was the gap between (i) official fears about the extent of the terrorist threat and (ii) public complacency engendered by the fact that none of the dire eventualities had come to pass. I came away from the seminar convinced that official concern was justified — that while there might be rivalries and infighting between security agencies, nevertheless they were broadly telling the truth. I walked to Holborn and boarded the Piccadilly line train to King’s Cross. The first station after Holborn is… Russell Square.

* After today, public perceptions about the reality of the threat will have changed radically. An irresponsible government could exploit this ruthlessly.

* There was much discussion in the seminar of parallels between contemporary terrorism and IRA terrorism of the period 1970 – 1995. At the beginning, the security services were poor at assessing and countering the IRA threat, but over the years they raised their game and became much better at it. I got the distinct impression that, in relation to Al Qaeda, the British security services are currently at a stage analogous to where they were with the IRA in the 1970s.

* One fascinating development was the way passengers in the tube trains used the video-recording facilities of their mobile phones to film compelling video sequences, many of which were screened on the BBC’s Ten O’Clock News. This is the first time we’ve seen the technology used to such good effect.

* The relative calm and absence of panic among victims was remarkable. Londoners are a tough bunch. My guess is, though, that the next few days will see mass cancellation of vacation bookings by Americans, who despite the gung-ho militarism of their society, seem pathologically nervous as individuals.

* The response and efficiency of the London emergency services was amazing. All those disaster training and simulation exercises have clearly paid off.

* The first thing I did was to make a list of those I knew and cared about in London and then started to check that they were ok. The mobile network in London was shut down by the authorities so that only those with special SIM cards could communicate for a time. But email worked just fine. Only one person in my immediate circle was affected — she was in a tube train which was attacked and was taken to hospital suffering from smoke inhalation, but is basically ok.

* I’m lecturing in London next week, and looking forward to it. Nil carborundum and all that. I’ll probably have to walk from King’s Cross though. Can’t imagine that they will get the tunnel fixed in time.

The Bush Administration’s proposals for the Net: live translation

In an extraordinary presentation last week, Michael D. Gallagher, Assistant Secretary at the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), outlined new “US principles” regarding the internet’s Domain Name System. They are:

1. The United States Government intends to preserve the security and stability of the Internet’s Domain Name and Addressing System (DNS). Given the Internet’s importance to the world’s economy, it is essential that the underlying DNS of the Internet remain stable and secure. As such, the United States is committed to taking no action that would have the potential to adversely impact the effective and efficient operation of the DNS and will therefore maintain its historic role in authorizing changes or modifications to the authoritative root zone file.

2. Governments have legitimate interest in the management of their country code top level domains (ccTLD). The United States recognizes that governments have legitimate public policy and sovereignty concerns with respect to the management of their ccTLD. As such, the United States is committed to working with the international community to address these concerns, bearing in mind the fundamental need to ensure stability and security of the Internet’s DNS.

3. ICANN is the appropriate technical manager of the Internet DNS. The United States continues to support the ongoing work of ICANN as the technical manager of the DNS and related technical operations and recognizes the progress it has made to date. The United States will continue to provide oversight so that ICANN maintains its focus and meets its core technical mission.

4. Dialogue related to Internet governance should continue in relevant multiple fora. Given the breadth of topics potentially encompassed under the rubric of Internet governance there is no one venue to appropriately address the subject in its entirety. While the United States recognizes that the current Internet system is working, we encourage an ongoing dialogue with all stakeholders around the world in the various fora as a way to facilitate discussion and to advance our shared interest in the ongoing robustness and dynamism of the Internet. In these fora, the United States will continue to support market-based approaches and private sector leadership in Internet development broadly.

Translation:

1. We don’t trust anybody else to run the Internet’s Root Servers, so we’ll continue to do it, thank you very much.

2. Other countries can do what they like with their national domains, so long as they accept Principle 1.

3. ICANN can manage the technical details and do the donkey work.

4. The UN has no serious role to play in any of this.

Unintended consequences

Just think: you have a nice business making great products, which are highly valued by their users. And then, one day, some terrorists hijack aircraft and fly them into tall buildings. And the next day, demand for your product falls to, well, nearly zero. Lovely, quirky Guardian piece by Luke Harding on the fortunes of the company that makes the Swiss army knife.

I’ve carried a SAK for as long as I remember. When the wonderful Knock airport opened in the 1980s, I was an early user. Once, a young, enthusiastic security guard spotted the knife in the tray alongside my loose change and watch as I was going through the metal-detection barrier. “I’m sorry, Sir”, he said officiously, “but you cannot take that on the plane”. Needless to say, I protested, and eventually my knife was solemnly handed over to a RyanAir stewardess, who placed it in a drawer on the plane and handed it back to me at Luton after we landed! Ah, the good old days…

(Which reminds me…) On another occasion, I landed at Knock late on a Sunday evening and went to the car hire desk to pick up the car I had booked. “I’m pleased to tell you”, said the chap behind the desk, “that you’ve been upgraded”.
“Wow!”, said I, “so what have I got?”
“A Nissan Micra.”
“But I ordered a Micra”
“Ah yes”, he said, “but this one’s an automatic!”

Hollywood gets the message that the music industry missed?

Well, well. From today’s New York Times

After years of avoiding it, Hollywood studios are preparing to let people download and buy electronic copies of movies over the Internet, much as record labels now sell songs for 99 cents through Apple Computer’s iTunes music store and other online services.

[…]

The studios have been working for months to confront the technological and business challenges of digital sales. Those initiatives gained new urgency on June 27 when the Supreme Court ruled that companies distributing software that allows users to trade pirated copies of audio and video files are liable for copyright infringement only if they induce users to break the law.

Sony, for example, is converting 500 movie titles to a digital format that can be downloaded and sold. Universal Pictures, a unit of NBC Universal, which is 80 percent owned by General Electric and 20 percent owned by Vivendi Universal, is preparing nearly 200 titles for digital online sale. And Warner Brothers, a division of Time Warner, says it has already digitized most of its library of 5,000 films and will start selling some of them online later this year.