In case of uncertainty

Well, how can you tell otherwise?

LATER: Lovely email from Ben Hammersley:

I know this! You spin them on their side, then lightly put your finger
on the top to stop them spinning. Take your finger off quickly. If it
remains stationary, it’s hard-boiled. If it keeps spinning, it’s raw.
It works because the raw yolk keeps moving inside the egg, so when you
take your finger off, the whole thing starts moving again.

Finally, I have a use for that. Hurrah!

Hurrah! x 2. Isn’t the web wonderful?

Davewatch

During the recent snowy spell, we took to putting newspaper down in the hall to reduce the amount of snow brought into the house. As luck would have it, the Guardian G2 issue about Dave Cameron was the first periodical that came to hand. We noticed that people stamped their Wellingtons rather enthusiastically upon entering. But at least they were green. Poor Dave became progressively more disfigured over the week, so in the end we put him out of his misery. On the fire.

Nipples, lies and digital images

There’s a wonderful analysis by Secure Computing of the way an image in the Victoria’s Secret catalogue was tastefully PhotoShopped, probably by a graphic artist as a routine job. There’s nothing really sinister in the story (a missing handbag, eyes and teeth enhanced, a nipple removed). It’s really just a fascinating forensic analysis of how you can detect PhotoShopped alterations if you know how.

There’s good news and bad news here. On the one hand, the case study provides a cautionary tale about how untrustworthy digital images have become; on the other, it shows how someone with the right tools and forensic skills can detect alterations.

Update: To be fair to Victoria’s Secret, they responded well to the critique (unlike Ralph Lauren, which in a similar case resorted to the DMCA takedown tactic).