Bob Cringeley wants to make an Open Source television show. Not as daft as it sounds either.

Typically thoughtful Economist piece on the nightmare facing the Hollywood studios as broadband links spread — that they will be Napsterised.

“The lesson from the music business is that, however hard they try, the studios will not be able to stop copies of movies from being downloaded from the Internet. What Hollywood has to do is find a reasonable balance between protecting revenues and keeping consumers happy. Striking that balance will not be easy. Movie makers do not want to encourage illegal copying on a massive scale by supplying unprotected digital copies themselves. And yet the more restrictive they try to be over what people can do with the movies they pay to download, the more the studios[base ‘] own Internet services will be a second-rate alternative to piracy. ”

Really sharp essay by Dave Winer on the current copy-protection mania in Congress

Excerpt:

The Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion Act would require rearchitecting all computer and software systems, and networks — including the Internet — so that every act of copying would be subject to what’s known as Digital Rights Management, a brilliant spin on an old idea, copy protection. It failed in the 80s, in the software business and the movie business, because copying is so very basic.

Computers do a lot of copying, all the time, and almost all of it is non-controversial. To insert a new controller into every bit of code and hardware that does copying would be like diverting the Mississippi River to irrigate the Great Plains, another idea the Congress contemplated at one time. You can’t do it, it won’t happen, there aren’t enough dollars or programmers in the world to make it so. Even in these tough economic times, it would be hard to recruit capable programmers to perform an act as utterly idiotic as trying to disable copying on computers.

Now the law may pass, but the future it envisions will not. The government will eventually realize that it would cripple even their own computers, so at some point they must come to their senses, and stop listening to the industry execs (many of whom are in bed with the entertainment industry) and talk directly to some scientists and engineers and find out what’s possible.

I suppose it’s also possible that we could vote Hollings and his colleagues out of office. That would be something. And politicians could be opportunists now, but only if they know something about computers. Get on the talk shows and strut [5] your stuff. A reasonably informed Congressperson could really shine now.

The ACM has written to Senator Hollings pointing out the flaws in the Security Systems Standards and Certification Act (SSSCA). It’s a good, temperate letter which can be found here.

Is the ‘digital divide’ narrowing?
Robert Samuelson thinks it is.

But he’s only talking about the domestic divide in the US, and even then I’m not sure. What his article does successfully highlight, though, is how vague the concept of the ‘divide’ seems to be.

A new role for the DMCA in quelling free speech
Salon article on how the ‘church’ of Scientology has found a way of using the Digital Millennium Copyright Act to intimidate ISPs hosting its critics’ web sites. Basically just another illustration of my ‘contested space’ thesis.