The Phorm letter

The Foundation for Information Policy Research has written an Open Letter to the Information Commissioner on the legality of Phorm’s advertising system. FIPR has also issued a Press Release which says, in part:

The controversial Phorm system is to be deployed by three of Britain’s largest ISPs, BT, Talk Talk and Virgin Media. However, in FIPR’s view the system will be processing data illegally:

* It will involve the processing of sensitive personal data: political opinions, sexual proclivities, religious views, and health — but it will not be operated by all of the ISPs on an “opt-in” basis, as is required by European Data Protection Law.
* Despite the attempts at anonymisation within the system, some people will remain identifiable because of the nature of their searches and the sites they choose to visit.
* The system will inevitably be looking at the content of some people’s email, into chat rooms and at social networking activity. Although well-known sites are said to be excluded, there are tens or hundreds of thousands of other low volume or semi-private systems.

More significantly, the Phorm system will be “intercepting” traffic within the meaning of s1 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA). In order for this to be lawful then permission is needed from not only the person making the web request BUT ALSO from the operator of the web site involved (and if it is a web-mail system, the sender of the email as well).

FIPR believes that although in some cases this permission can be assumed, in many other cases, it is explicitly NOT given — making the Phorm system illegal to operate in the UK:

* Many websites require registration, and only make their contents available to specific people.
* Many websites or particular pages within a website are part of the “unconnected web” — their existence is only made known to a small number of trusted people.

The full text of the open letter is here.

Bear Stuffed

Charles Arthur has come up with an inspired analogy for the sub-prime credit syndrome

But here’s the thing: all the reselling and leveraging of debt, in some cases producing up to $60 of “debt” from $1 of assets (and those assets not always too certain – how much is a house worth? Only what you can get someone to pay for it), was a way of feeding back into the system things that were already contaminated.

Which reminds me of the story that I covered in great detail in the late 1990s and early 2000s: BSE. Cows, fed ground-up cows. Any trace of disease (especially a brain-rotting one, which may have been endemic) gets transmitted throughout the (thundering) herd.

BSE turned out to be very, very hard indeed to eradicate – I’m not sure it’s gone away even now. (I’ll check the stats in a bit.) I think that the financial BSE in the system now is going to prove just as hard to get rid of; only when you flush all the crap that the banks have been feeding each other out of the system can you be sure it’s OK. And how long exactly will that take?

Going phishing

Aw, isn’t this sweet. My bank is anxious to safeguard my account.

It’s nice that they appreciate my ‘bunsiness’. And amazing that people fall for this stuff. But they do. They should take our course.

Detecting PhotoShopped fraud

Interesting research by Micah Kimo Johnson at MIT. Abstract:

The compositing of two or more people into a single image is a common form of manipulation. We describe how such composites can be detected by estimating a camera’s intrinsic parameters from the image of a person’s eyes. Differences in these parameters across the image are used as evidence of tampering.

Full paper (pdf) here.

Bear Stearns goes for a song

Oooh…. there’s something really delicious about the news that JP Morgan Chase is picking up Bear Stearns for a song. As I recall, Bear Stearns was the only major Wall Street bank which refused to participate in the whip-round to rescue the Long Term Capital Management hedge fund in 1998.

In a shocking deal reached on Sunday to save Bear Stearns, JPMorgan Chase agreed to pay a mere $2 a share to buy all of Bear — less than one-tenth the firm’s market price on Friday.

As part of the watershed deal, JPMorgan and the Federal Reserve will guarantee the huge trading obligations of the troubled firm, which was driven to the brink of bankruptcy by what amounted to a run on the bank.

Reflecting Bear’s dire straits, JPMorgan agreed to pay only about $270 million in stock for the firm, which had run up big losses on investments linked to mortgages.

JPMorgan is buying Bear, which has 14,000 employees, for a third the price at which the smaller firm went public in 1985. Only a year ago, Bear’s shares sold for $170. The sale price includes Bear Stearns’s soaring Madison Avenue headquarters.

The agreement ended a day in which bankers and policy makers were racing to complete the takeover agreement before financial markets in Asia opened on Monday, fearing that the financial panic could spread if the 85-year-old investment bank failed to find a buyer…

I know this stuff is serious and I ought to be very grown-up about the fact that all our pensions are tied up in this nonsense, etc. etc., but still…

What’s also interesting is the speed and efficiency with which the ailing bank was rescued: compare that with the fiasco of Northern Rock. In the pre-FSA regime, the bank of England could have organised the same kind of swift, ruthless, effective rescue.

Happy St Patrick’s Day!

I’ve always been a bit suspicious of the Patrick legend. For example, it is claimed that he banished snakes from Ireland. This is dubious on two counts: first of all, there’s no evidence that there were ever snakes in post-glacial Ireland; secondly, Fianna Fail is still in business — and indeed running the country. The shamrock nonsense comes from the legend that St Pat, seeking some way of explaining the Christian doctrine of the Holy Trinity to my (dense) fellow-countrymen, came up with the wheeze of showing them a three-leaf clover. Seems that they fell for it, big time.

On this day…

… in 1968, during the Vietnam War, the My Lai Massacre — in which somewhere between 275 and 500 Vietnamese villagers, nearly all of them unarmed children, women and elderly — was carried out by United States troops under the command of Lt. William Calley Jr. Forty years on, there have been some commemorative ceremonies at My Lai.

Ron Haberle, a military photographer who accompanied the troops, took this photograph on the day.

The strange thing about this image is how calm and relaxed the soldier appears to be as he torches someone’s home.

The great journalist Seymour Hersh eventually broke the story on November 12, 1969, after which the US Army launched an investigation, which was conducted by General William Peers.

Here’s an excerpt from the Peers report:

The fire team of the lst Squad, which had searched through the southeastern portion of the hamlet, arrived at the ditch at about 0900 hours and brought with it approximately 10 additional villagers. The villagers were herded into the ditch with the larger group of 60-70. (There has been testimony from Vietnamese witnesses that an additional number of villagers, pos sibly 50 or more, were either brought to the ditch from surrounding subhamlets or sought refuge in the ditch from the C Company action. Testimony from US personnel to substantiate the Vietnamese statements has not been developed by this Inquiry.) At approximately 0900-0915 hours, Vietnamese personnel who had been herded into the ditch were shot down by menters of the lst Platoon.

Inside the subhamlet of Binh Tay, the 2d Platoon continued the pattern of burning, killings, and rapes which it had followed in My Lai (4). Besides scattered killing which took place inside the subhamlet, a group of Vietnamese women and children (approximately 10-20) were rounded up, brought to the southern end of Binh Tay, and made to squat in a circle. Several 40mm rounds from an M-79 grenade launcher were fired into their midst, killing several and wounding many. The wounded were subsequently killed by small arms fire from members of the platoon. Witnesses from the platoon have testified to observing at least one gang-rape of a young Vietnamese girl, an act of sodomy, and several other rape/killings while inside Binh Tay.

On the LZ, the 3d Squad of the 3d Platoon had returned at approximately 0845 hours from its movement to the south. LT LaCross left the squad and moved to the northwest corner of the hamlet where he conferred with CPT Medina for a short while. CPT Medina told him to have his platoon begin moving through the village for the mop-up operation. LT LaCross followed behind SGT (now Mr.) Smail’s lst Squad on the left (north) flank (see sketch 6-11). SGT Grimes’ 3d Squad moved on the southern flank. The platoon, accompanied by SFC Maroney’s mortar squad, entered the western edge of the hamlet between 0845-0900 hours. CPT Medina and his command group followed behind the platoon.

After CPT Medina and the command group had moved into the hamlet for a short distance (see sketch 6-12), an old Vietnamese man with two children was apprehended and brought to their location. He was interrogated by SGT Phu, CPT Medina’s Vietnamese interpreter (see exhibits P-66 and 67). The old mm informed Medina that 30-40 VC had been in My Lai (4) the previous, evening but had departed the hamlet that morning prior to the combat assault. (This information was reported and recorded on the llth Brigade Journal. The command group then moved farther into the village toward the east and southeast.

Forward of the command group, the 3d Platoon went about the destruction of crops-and the burning of houses in a thorough systematic manner (see exhibits P-15, 35, 16, 33, 56, and 14). Throughout the hamlet, members of the platoon and the two PIO men who accompanied them observed the bodies of Vietnamese killed earlier during the lst and 2nd Platoons’ advance (see exhibits P-34, 37, and 32). Members of the 3d Platoon slaughtered most of the remaining livestock, and in at least one instance participated in the killing of about five or six seriously wounded Vietnamese to “put them out of their misery” since “they did not give them medical aid.”

According to Wikipedia,

On 17 March 1970, the United States Army charged 14 officers, including Major General Samuel W. Koster, the Americal Division’s commanding officer, with suppressing information related to the incident. Most of those charges were later dropped. Brigade commander Henderson was the only officer who stood trial on charges relating to the cover-up; he was acquitted on December 17, 1971.

After a 10-month-long trial, in which he claimed that he was following orders from his commanding officer, Captain Medina, Calley was convicted, on September 10, 1971, of premeditated murder for ordering the shootings. He was initially sentenced to life in prison. Two days later, however, President Nixon made the controversial decision to have Calley released from prison, pending appeal of his sentence. Calley’s sentence was later adjusted, so that he would eventually serve four and one-half months in a military prison at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, during which time he was allowed routine and unrestricted visits by his girlfriend.

In a separate trial, Captain Medina denied giving the orders that led to the massacre, and was acquitted of all charges, effectively negating the prosecution’s theory of “command responsibility”, now referred to as the “Medina standard”. Several months after his acquittal, however, Medina admitted that he had suppressed evidence and had lied to Colonel Henderson about the number of civilian deaths.

Most of the enlisted men who were involved in the events at My Lai had already left military service, and were thus legally exempt from prosecution. In the end, of the 26 men initially charged, Calley’s was the only conviction.

I’m reminded of something Gandhi said when asked by reporters what he thought of Western Civilisation. “Ah, Western Civilisation”, he replied, smiling beatifically, “now that would be a good idea.”

The battle for Wikipedia’s soul

Thoughtful piece in the Economist about the internal struggle in Wikipedia.

IT IS the biggest encyclopedia in history and the most successful example of “user-generated content” on the internet, with over 9m articles in 250 languages contributed by volunteers collaborating online. But Wikipedia is facing an identity crisis as it is torn between two alternative futures. It can either strive to encompass every aspect of human knowledge, no matter how trivial; or it can adopt a more stringent editorial policy and ban articles on trivial subjects, in the hope that this will enhance its reputation as a trustworthy and credible reference source. These two conflicting visions are at the heart of a bitter struggle inside Wikipedia between “inclusionists”, who believe that applying strict editorial criteria will dampen contributors’ enthusiasm for the project, and “deletionists” who argue that Wikipedia should be more cautious and selective about its entries…

Why follow?

James Cridland is puzzled by the fact that 122 people ‘follow’ him on Twitter. So he asked them (via Twitter) to tell him why — and wrote about the answers. As you’d expect, they’re varied. I saw his tweet too late to respond, but my answer would be “because I like to know what you’re up to. And because I’m puzzled by your obsession with beer.”

The sound of silence

From CNET News.com

The notebook I’m testing — a Dell Latitude D830 with a 64GB flash hard drive from Samsung — hasn’t emitted a sound in three days. Flash drives, which store data in NAND flash memory, don’t require motors or spinning platters. Thus, there are no whirring mechanical noises.

Compare that with my T42 ThinkPad. It sounds like a guinea pig got trapped inside, particularly during the start-up phase. Vzoooot. Cronk, cronk, cronk. Zip, zip. (Pause.) Gurlagurlagurla…zweeee.

The lack of a mechanical hard drive also means lower power consumption and less heat. In turn that means the fan rarely, if ever, needs to kick into action. As I type, for instance, the notebook is running eight video streams– two from CNN, two from CNET, two from MSN, a video on new bands on Crackle, and a pirated Led Zeppelin video on YouTube — and the fan won’t trip over. The computer is running on battery power and the videos, with a few minor gulps, are all running smoothly…

I know just what he means — I’m writing this on my little ASUS EeePC, which has no moving parts at all.