”The most talked about issues in AI today: deepfakes, bias, explainability, privacy, all have trust as a common denominator.”
- Technology Review
”The most talked about issues in AI today: deepfakes, bias, explainability, privacy, all have trust as a common denominator.”
“I do not read advertisements. I would spend all of my time wanting things”
Hmmm… Fascinating report in today’s NYT:
WASHINGTON — The National Security Agency has taken a significant step toward protecting the world’s computer systems, announcing Tuesday that it alerted Microsoft to a vulnerability in its Windows operating system rather than following the agency’s typical approach of keeping quiet and exploiting the flaw to develop cyberweapons.
The warning allowed Microsoft to develop a patch for the problem and gave the government an early start on fixing the vulnerability. In years past, the National Security Agency has collected all manner of computer vulnerabilities to gain access to digital networks to gather intelligence and generate hacking tools to use against American adversaries.
The foolishness of policy was critically exposed A while back when some of those tools fell into the hands of cybercriminals and other baddies, including North Korean and Russian hackers.
So does this new spirit of cooperative ness signal a real shift in strategy? Or does it just show that the agency was temporarily traumatised by accusations that its unscrupulous collection of vulnerabilities caused hundreds of millions of dollars in damage? Should we believe the declaration by Anne Neuburger, the NSA’s Cybersecurity director, that “We wanted to take a new approach to sharing and also really work to build trust with the cybersecurity community.”
Good news if she’s serious. And the theft of the tools should serve as a warning against governments’ incessant campaign for backdoors into commercial encryption systems.
”Awareness is rapidly changing, and I believe we are on the edge of a fundamental reshaping of finance. The evidence on climate risk is compelling investors to reassess core assumptions about modern finance.”
Er, what took you so long, Larry?
No surprises, really. But useful to have empirical evidence.
See Source for details.
Twenty years ago we searched for islands of digital access in a sea of meatspace—homes, offices, internet cafes; now we seek equally scattered pockets of protection from that connectivity, and those pockets are increasingly the products of conscious design.
From “Can we fix the Air?”, a sobering post by the Azimuth Project about the possibilities of absorbing CO2:
Totaling up some of the options I’ve listed, we could draw down 1 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide by planting trees, 1.5 billion by better forest management, 3 billion by better agricultural practices, and up to 5.2 billion by biofuels with carbon capture. This adds up to over 10 billion tonnes per year. It’s not nearly enough to cancel the 37 billion tonnes we’re dumping into the air each year now. But combined with strenuous efforts to cut emissions, we might squeak by, and keep global warming below 2 degrees Celsius.
We might. But the prospects of the world implementing the measures outlined in the post are, I think, zero.
From a “Blogging in an expert society” by Ken Smith:
At least there are certain mistakes that bloggers don’t often make:
They usually don’t pull rank.
They usually don’t insist that a problem can be solved only by a certain kind of expert or talked about only in one kind of language.
They tend to think that people’s experience has something to offer.
They assume that tradition or dogma should be challenged by people reflecting on their experiences.
They get riled up, but down deep they like to hear more voices, not fewer. They want their turn to speak, not the only turn. They get really impatient, but down deep they want democracy.
(HT to Dave Winer)