More IP madness

Posted on by

From David Pogue’s Blog…

Today, a cheery/hilarious/frightening story from reader Jeanine Weekes Schroer that really rings the bell on the Ridiculous meter:

“I just had an extremely frustrating experience with the Yahoo/Target photo service, where you upload pictures on Yahoo to pick up prints at Target (in an hour, if you’d like).

“I had uploaded ten pictures (random stuff); I asked for a mix of 8 by 10s, 5 by 7s, and 4 by 6s. One was of my husband’s boat, because he loves it, and another was of my husband fishing near our home, because I love him.

“I showed up at Target’s Photo Center in my small town. The very sweet young girl found my envelope, but it had a note attached to it. The note said, ‘Ask for Copyright release for the 2 pictures lying on the dryer rack.’

“She called for assistance, because she was unsure what to do. The person who answered her call ALSO called for assistance, because she also did not know what to do. A third woman arrived.

“She told me that because of copyright concerns, Target reserves the right not to sell any picture that appears to be professional. She said, ‘Anyone can just download any picture they want, and we’d be liable. I’m sorry, we will not sell you the prints.’

“I proceeded to explain to her, as I had to the sweet teenager and the assistant, that one is a picture of my husband, and the other has ME IN IT with a camera! Surely that doesn’t appear to be professional staging. The manager reiterated, ‘I’m sorry.’

“I asked her if there was any paperwork I could fill out, swearing authorship of the pictures. She reiterated, ‘I’m sorry.’ Then she wandered off.

“They made lame intimations that they could do it if I had the original prints or film (but it was a digital camera, so no such monster), or if I could bring digital media with the pictures on it. I explained that the pictures were both more than a year old and no longer maintained on any memory card.

“It seems to me that they have not worked out a system for best serving the consumer, protecting copyright interests, and fending off lawsuits. I was furious and vowed in a letter never to use their photo system again–and never to go to Target again…

Political realities — US style

Posted on by

From the latest Pew Research Center Report…

More than two-thirds of Americans (69%) said in May that they were following news about the high price of gasoline these days very closely, as high as in the months following Hurricane Katrina last fall. A recent survey by the Pew Center for the People & the Press found that the issue of immigration (44%) and the situation in Iraq (42%) also attracted close attention from a sizeable minority. Attention to news from Iraq has remained relatively steady for over a year now (dipping significantly below 40% only in the immediate wake of Hurricane Katrina). Just (16%) say they have been tracking news about ethnic violence in the Darfur region of Sudan very closely, while 33% say they have not followed this issue closely at all…

That Ken Loach film…

Posted on by

… already has Britain’s reactionary newspaper columnists (including Michael Gove, one of Dave Cameron’s friends and relations) in a frenzy of indignation (though it seems that none of them has actually, er, seen the film). Their basic line is the hoary old one — that ‘our’ boys would never do anything nasty to people, like shooting them in the back, or clubbing them to death. (Try telling that to the relatives of the people who were shot dead by the Paras in the Bloody Sunday massacre in Derry all those years ago.)

There’s a nice column in today’s Guardian by George Monbiot, in which he ingeniously draws a parallel between the Black and Tans who inadvertently persuaded my countrymen to support a war of independence, and what we are now finding out about the behaviour of the Americans in Iraq. And the moral? If you’re occupying someone else’s country, brutality comes with the territory.

My paternal grandfather was not a political animal. He believed in keeping his head down. But his views about the British were irrevocably shaped when he and his brother were dragged off a donkey cart in Connemara by a passing detachment of Tans who gave them a casual beating before going on their merry way. I expect that many ‘non-political’ Iraqis feel the same about the Yanks — and, who knows? — maybe about the Brits too.

Google takes logical next step

Posted on by

John Markoff’s had the nod…

SAN FRANCISCO, June 5 — Stepping up its attack on Microsoft’s core business, Google plans to make available on Tuesday a test version of a Web-based spreadsheet program that is intended to make it simple to edit and share lists and data online.

The company said that the free program, called Google Spreadsheets, would be able to read and create files in the format used by Excel, the Microsoft spreadsheet software that is installed on millions of personal computers. The spreadsheet service is another step in Google’s steady march toward creating its own computing universe that is an alternative to desktop PC software now dominated by Microsoft. It comes just months after Google bought a small Silicon Valley company called Upstartle, creators of a Web-based word-processing program called Writely…

What took them so long?

Later…There’s lots of commentary in the Blogosphere today about what this signifies. The obvious interpretation is that Google is really attacking Microsoft. If it is, then it’s doing so in a really smart way, because it’s refusing to fight on Microsoft’s territory — which is the platform, i.e. the PC. Google has declined to compete in that space and is providing services on the Web which offer a severely limited amount of the functionality that Microsoft provides in its PC software. Nicholas Carr has an interesting post to this effect. Extract:

So why would Google put out a product that makes its arch-rival’s product more valuable? Because Google doesn’t want to compete with Office. It sees Office as part of the existing landscape, and it wants to build a new layer of functionality on top of that landscape. No one is going to stop buying Office because Google Spreadsheets exists. But what people may well do is use Spreadsheets for sharing Excel and other data online – rather than just emailing Excel files around, as they used to. If Google Spreadsheets competes with a Microsoft product, it competes with a Microsoft product that doesn’t yet exist: Excel Live, Microsoft’s own web interface for Excel data.

Leica – a la carte

Posted on by

Well, this takes the biscuit!…

To give this quality an unmistakable, personal touch, Leica is now offering you an ambitious unique modular system. The Leica à la carte principle lets you configure your own Leica M camera, which will then be produced just for you. You choose all of the individual details that perfectly suit your functional, esthetic and practical preferences, starting with the color of the camera top and type of leather finish, following with different viewfinder frames and ending with personal engravings such as signatures and markings which clearly prove that your Leica is a unique item. Of course, this is only possible because each Leica is made by hand in the traditional way practised in the factory in Solms.

Er, no mention of anything as vulgar as price. I’m sticking with my (black) M6.

Missing columns

Posted on by

For the last two Sundays some unexplained glitch has prevented the publication of my column on the Web edition of the Observer. While an explanation is being sought (and the Editor looks for The Guilty Man) I’ve decided to go in for a spot of self-publication.

The column for May 28 is here. It’s about corporate hubris and the risks thereof. Sample:

Nothing succeeds like success, especially in the wishful thinking of technology companies and their Wall Street shareholders. The moment a company shows signs of dominating a particular market, then its executives — and their stockholders — begin to dream about dominating other markets in which they had hitherto no expertise. They are encouraged in this delusion by the mainstream media, which are irresistibly fascinated by the hubris implicit in corporate megalomania.

The best-known case study is, of course Microsoft…

But the column is actually as much about Google as about the Gates empire.

The column for today (4 June) is here. Sample:

If, like me, you while away the time while waiting for a Tube train by browsing the display ads on the wall opposite the platform, you will have been struck by some recent Microsoft advertisements. They show office workers wearing dinosaur-head masks engaging in laboured banter, in which one worker berates the other for his or her obsolete work practices.

My first reaction was to conclude that Microsoft had picked a turkey of an advertising agency, because the ads and the dialogue are so entirely devoid of the creativity that large advertising budgets are supposed to command. But this rapidly gave way to puzzlement. You see, it’s clear that the people in the ads are users of Microsoft software: they have to be because most office workers are. So why is Microsoft insulting its users by portraying them as dinosaurs? After all, treating your customers as idiots is not generally a sustainable business strategy — though the record and movie industries haven’t quite twigged that yet. But Microsoft isn’t a brain-dead organisation like Sony BMG or Warner Brothers. Au contraire. So what’s going on with these daft ads?

Al Gore’s Keynote address

Posted on by

There’s been a lot of careless talk in the mainstream media about Al Gore’s “PowerPoint presentation” on global climate change. In fact he uses Keynote, an Apple program. But I suppose it’s unrealistic to expect the average hack to appreciate the difference.