YouTube’s business plan emerges from mist

Acute observations from Good Morning Silicon Valley.

This morning YouTube lit up its “Paris Hilton Channel,” a collection of videos, interviews and other detritus offered in promotion of “Paris,” Hilton’s first effort as a recording artist — and along with it an ad for Fox’s TV show “Prison Break,” revenue from which will presumably underwrite some of the site’s bandwidth costs. “So will Paris Hilton and other stars counteract YouTube’s ludicrous bandwidth expenses,” asks Mashable’s Pete Cashmore. “I actually think they might — despite all the anti-hype around YouTube and the recurring question ‘Where’s the Business Model,’ I think it’s pretty clear that YouTube is a powerful branding platform — and not just for stars like Paris Hilton. MySpace has totally changed the nature of advertising — users now make friends with brands (see MySpace Marketing and Dasani’s custom MySpace layouts), and advertising is no longer about pushing content to people when they don’t want it. The Paris Hilton channel is just the start, and I expect to see hundreds more of these things springing up — why shouldn’t every media company have their own YouTube channel and MySpace page?”

Planned pay-for-placement channels are just one part of YouTube’s new advertising strategy. The video-sharing site has begun displaying commercials on its homepage as well. Interestingly, the site treats these ads just like any other video it hosts — allowing users to rate them, comment on them, or even embed them in their own Web sites. “These days, consumers are like walking TiVos, filtering out so much of what they see and hear in advertising,” said Mark Kingdon, chief executive of digital ad agency Organic, which produced the “Prison Break” spots appearing on the Paris Hilton Channel. “To reach this media-savvy demographic, advertisers have to ‘give to get.’ In other words, they have to give viewers something special, something unique, in exchange for their attention.”

Later… More useful reporting on TechCrunch.

The war on photog…, er, terror (contd.)

From John Simons’s Blog

On my recent trip back from India on British Airways, I was inspired by Julieanne Kost’s recent book, Window Seat (not to be confused with another book of the same title by Dicum) to snap some landscape photos at 35000 feet. I think we were over Iran at the time. After taking several shots, imagine my surprise when one of the BA attendants closed the window shade and informed me that it was against British Airways policy for passengers to take such photos for security reasons. I thought she was kidding, but the head attendant confirmed what I had been told. And that it had nothing to do with where we were flying.

Vodafone 3G On Apple MacBook Via USB

The only thing I want 3G mobile telephony for is broadband access on the move. Problem is: I don’t have a laptop with a PCMCIA slot. (And even when I did, the only PCMCIA cards available came with Windows-only drivers.) But now Vodafone are releasing a USB 3G modem.

[Link from Digital-Lifestyles.info via Quentin.]

3G is only an interim solution, I know. And it’s relatively expensive in the UK (see summary of data charges here). And Vodafone’s 3G coverage seems astonishingly skimpy. Still…

Symbiosis in action

Nice MediaGuardian column by Jeff Jarvis

Bloggers don’t think they’ll replace reporters, they want to work in symbiotic bliss, amateur alongside professional, complementing each other’s skills to expand the reach of the news. I call this networked journalism and I am seeing more examples of the two tribes coming together not to clash but to conspire.

For example, when a Reuters lensman faked up photos from Lebanon, blogger Charles Johnson at littlegreenfootballs.com demonstrated just how Photoshopping had oomphed up the action. Johnson was the same blogger who showed how the documents underlying former CBS anchor Dan Rather’s investigation of George Bush’s military service had been faked. But big media’s reaction this time was different. CBS stonewalled for 11 days. Reuters responded by suspending, then firing the photographer. They also gave Johnson credit, which is to say that Reuters saw they were on the same side – the side of honesty.

Similarly, when AOL released millions of web searches, thinking the information was anonymous, it was bloggers, like techcrunch.com’s Michael Arrington, who realised searches can reveal our identity. The New York Times reported a magnificent story tracking down searcher “no. 4417749” as an old lady in Georgia who’d sought “women’s underwear” and “dog who urinates on everything”. The Times, like the Washington Post, gave nods to bloggers for doing the legwork…

Home Solar as User Generated Content

Like many people, I’ve been brooding on my domestic energy use and wondering what to do about it. I’m fascinated by what Peter Armstrong has been doing to reduce the carbon footprint of his family (and keep warm while saving money). Likewise, I’m intrigued by the potential of small wind turbines (and if I lived in Ireland I would certainly have one already). But this post by Tim O’Reilly suggests another way of looking at home generation.

In a conversation the other day, Ed Kummer of Disney made a really thought-provoking observation: the spread of solar energy units to homes and businesses is an analog to other forms of user-generated content, and the overall trend towards a two-way network. While it’s possible to set up a solar system completely off the grid, most of the new customers feed power into the grid during sunlight hours, and draw from it when the daylight wanes. If we move to a solar power economy, it will be much more distributed and cooperative than the current one-way model…

Video satire

I’ve been looking at some of the hilarious video satires that increasingly pop up on YouTube and Google Video. here, for example, is a Bush ‘State of the Union’ Address ingeniously doctored. And here is a German video showing that Dubya is in fact a remotely-controlled robot.

On the other hand, here is Dubya doing an hilarious double act with comedian Steve Bridges at the annual White House Correspondents’ Dinner.

Can’t censor the internet? Tell that to your compliant ISP

This morning’s Observer column

Dr Godfrey sued for defamation and, in 1997, won. Demon appealed but then unexpectedly decided to settle, paying Godfrey damages and costs. As a result, a chilling legal precedent was set which essentially undermines Gilmore’s blithe confidence in the ability of the net to overcome censorship. Godfrey v. Demon Internet established the principle that if you complain to an ISP about something hosted on its servers and the ISP does nothing about it, it can be held liable in subsequent proceedings.

Every since then, censoring the web has been child’s play, at least in the UK and Europe. Here’s how it works. If you don’t like something someone says about you on a website, get a lawyer to write a ‘notice and takedown’ (snotty, in other words) letter to the ISP that hosts the site. Seven times out of 10, the ISP will pull the plug on the site without further ado – and certainly without considering whether your complaint has any merit.

You think I jest?