Mighty Mouse

The news that Steve Jobs is to join the Board of Walt Disney (as a result of selling his company, Pixar, to them) prompted the following exchange on Slashdot:

Does this mean that Mickey Mouse will now only have 1 button?

Yes, but when they release the new Minnie Mouse her button will provide 4-way scrolling action.

Apologies: geeky joke. Explanation: Apple’s fanatical commitment to a one-button mouse was one of the longest-running annoyances in the business and was widely attributed to Steve Jobs’s intransigence. (He has Strong Views on interface matters.) But he must have changed his mind because Apple recently released a fancy multi-function mouse called Mighty Mouse. It’s terrific, IMHO, especially if you suffer from arthritis.

Thanks to Dave Hill for spotting the Slashdot thread.

Jack Anderson

The great muckraking journalist has died, aged 83. There’s an appreciative Guardian obit which recalls how much Anderson was loathed (and feared) by those in power. FBI chief J Edgar Hoover once described him as “lower than the regurgitated filth of vultures”. Wow! To be so reviled by such a creep as Hoover is praise indeed.

Very good biography of Anderson on Spartacus.schoolnet.

Bubble bursts Hollywood?

Tech Review reminds us that

Today is the release date for Bubble, a new film directed by [Steven] Soderbergh and released by HDNET Films, an upstart film company cofounded by [Mark] Cuban. Setting Bubble apart from, say, Nanny McPhee and Big Momma’s House 2, two other films debuting on Friday, is that the film will be available in cinemas and on the HDNET cable channel on the same day. What’s more, just four days later, it will be out on DVD. In other words: there will be no “window” between its theatrical release and its availability for home viewing.

Middle-aged dog tries to learn new tricks

Well, well. According to MIT’s Technology Review, Microsoft

is reorganizing part of its research-and-development operation to create new products faster, and to compete with the seemingly vast array of innovative consumer software and services that companies like Google and Yahoo bring to market on a weekly basis.

Its new organization, called Live Labs, consists of some 85 researchers drawn from two existing divisions, Microsoft Research and the Microsoft Network (MSN). Both organizations are heavily involved in creating new Microsoft offerings, such as MSN Search, introduced last year. But Live Labs is designed to act as a “perpetual startup” within Microsoft, in the words of the organization’s new director Gary Flake — an incubator where software engineers can rapidly test ideas for Web-based services and other software, then shepherd the best concepts to market.

The formation of Live Labs, says Tech review

appears to constitute an admission by Microsoft that its traditional, gradualist approach to research, code development, testing, and marketing is not well suited for an era when younger competitors post beta versions of latest software on the Web almost as soon as their programmers have dreamed them up, then let them evolve in response to user feedback.

Quite so. And how nice that the guy in charge is called Flake. Of Cadbury proportions, we hope.

The Alice in Wonderland World of DRM

Ed Felten has an amazing story on his Blog. Here’s the gist:

If you’ve been reading here lately, you know that I’m no fan of the Sensenbrenner/Conyers analog hole bill. The bill would require almost all analog video devices to implement two technologies called CGMS-A and VEIL. CGMS-A is reasonably well known, but the VEIL content protection technology is relatively new. I wanted to learn more about it.

So I emailed the company that sells VEIL and asked for a copy of the specification. I figured I would be able to get it. After all, the bill would make compliance with the VEIL spec mandatory — the spec would in effect be part of the law. Surely, I thought, they’re not proposing passing a secret law. Surely they’re not going to say that the citizenry isn’t allowed to know what’s in the law that Congress is considering. We’re talking about television here, not national security.

After some discussion, the company helpfully explained that I could get the spec, if I first signed their license agreement. The agreement requires me (a) to pay them $10,000, and (b) to promise not to talk to anybody about what is in the spec. In other words, I can know the contents of the bill Congress is debating, but only if I pay $10k to a private party, and only if I promise not to tell anybody what is in the bill or engage in public debate about it.

Worse yet, this license covers only half of the technology: the VEIL decoder, which detects VEIL signals. There is no way you or I can find out about the encoder technology that puts VEIL signals into video.

The details of this technology are important for evaluating this bill. How much would the proposed law increase the cost of televisions? How much would it limit the future development of TV technology? How likely is the technology to mistakenly block authorized copying? How adaptable is the technology to the future? All of these questions are important in debating the bill. And none of them can be answered if the technology part of the bill is secret.

Latin gags

Today’s Daily Telegraph reports that actor Brad Pitt’s current inamorato, a lady whose name escapes me, has the Latin inscription Quod me nutrit me destruit tattoed in Gothic type “across her lower stomach”. I’m sure you know that this translates as “What nourishes me, destroys me”. But what I want to know is what the Torygraph is doing inspecting the lower stomach regions of actresses.

End of an era

This was the scene in Trinity Street, Cambridge, this morning, as the funeral cortege of Philip Grierson made its way slowly to his College, where it was greeted by a silent crowd of mourners. He died on January 15 at the ripe old age of 95 and was the last of a distinctive breed — the bachelor Don, who lived all his adult life in College rooms and devoted most of his energies to teaching, research and scholarship. Philip Grierson was an historian who specialised in numismatics and built up (on a university salary) one of the world’s greatest collections of medieval coins — reportedly valued at between £5 and £10 million. (He donated the collection to the Fitzwilliam Museum.)

In the best tradition of his class, Grierson had memorable eccentricities: he could fly a plane but never learned to drive a car; he once walked from London to Cambridge (a distance of 56 miles) simply because he had missed his train; and he simultaneously held major academic posts at three important institutions — Cambridge, Brussels and Harvard’s Dumbarton Oaks Collection. He seems to have been a formidable scholar, producing upwards of three hundred academic papers and numerous scholarly tomes.

One thing seems certain: we shall not see his like again — the bean-counting ethos implicit in the Research Assessment Exercise has seen to that. Ambitious Cambridge academics are increasing wary of College life because it threatens to distract them from research and embroil them in pastoral care of the young.

There were some nice obituaries — notably in the Guardian and the London Times. The bulk of the text of the Independent‘s obit has disappeared behind a paywall, alas.