That Microsoft mobile phone joke…

… turns out to be a variant on a venerable theme. Dave Hill, whose memory, like that of the elephant, retains everything, sent me this — dated 1999!

The emerging two cultures on the Internet

One of the high points for me of going to the Friends of O’Reilly camp in Holland recently was seeing Ben Hammersley in the flesh. He writes one of the most interesting Blogs around, is outrageously talented and unforgiveably young. And, like me, he likes fine cigars. Need one say more? This week, he’s put up two interesting meditations on something quite profound, namely the realisation that Internet users who do not protect themselves with firewalls and anti-virus software are almost as guilty as the creeps who pollute the commons with spam and malware. “People who can’t filter spam, or block pop-ups, or prevent viruses from spreading”, he writes, “are themselves responsible for these things. There are two cultures growing — those who can filter, and those who can’t — and it may well be up to us who can to help those who can’t to join the modern world, lest they drag everyone back with them.” Or, to put it another way, “Firewalls, anti-virus, and anti-malware systems aren’t for your own protection anymore, but for everyone else’s benefit instead.”

That’s one of the reasons my colleagues and I at the Open University produced an online course on the subject of understanding and combating malicious software. The course has just finished its first presentation and has had an astonishing (and gratifying) level of student interest and participation.

Those cerebral Bushes

Memo to self: must get a copy of Kitty Kelley’s new biography of Dubya. Here’s an excerpt from a piece by David Talbot of Salon based on a conversation with Kelley:

“But, as one of W’s Yalie frat brothers tells Kelley, it’s not the substance abuse in Bush’s past that’s disturbing, it’s the “lack of substance … Georgie, as we called him, had absolutely no intellectual curiosity about anything. He wasn’t interested in ideas or in books or causes. He didn’t travel; he didn’t read the newspapers; he didn’t watch the news; he didn’t even go to the movies. How anyone got out of Yale without developing some interest in the world besides booze and sports stuns me.” New Yorker writer Brendan Gill recalls roaming the Kennebunkport compound one night while staying there looking for a book to read – the only title he could find was The Fart Book.”

Baghdad live — and dead

On Sunday, 13 Iraqis were killed and dozens injured in Baghdad when US helicopters fired on a crowd of unarmed civilians. Guardian columnist Ghaith Abdul-Ahad, who was injured in the attack, has written an extraordinary account of what happened – and revealed just how lucky he was to walk away. Here’s an excerpt:

“One of the three men piled together raised his head and looked around the empty streets with a look of astonishment on his face. He then looked at the boy in front of him, turned to the back and looked at the horizon again. Then he slowly started moving his head to the ground, rested his head on his arms and stretched his hands towards something that he could see. It was the guy who had been beating his chest earlier, trying to help his brother. He wanted help but no one helped. He was just there dying in front of me. Time didn’t exist. The streets were empty and silent and the men lay there dying together. He slid down to the ground, and after five minutes was flat on the street.”

Batman strikes again

A protester for “fathers’ rights” wearing a Batman costume got into the grounds of Buckingham Palace (one of the Queen’s tied cottages) and scaled the front wall, upon which he placed a banner advertising his grievances. Big deal. But you would think from the hysterical reaction of the British media (lead item on the BBC Ten O’Clock News for well over five minutes) — closely followed by hysterical politicians — that (a) the entire fabric of civilisation had been rent asunder, and (b) that he had actually threatened the Queen. In fact, the lady in question was far away, taking one of her interminable holidays on one of her vast estates (Balmoral in the Scottish highlands). I am reminded of Thomas Macaulay’s observation that “We know no spectacle so ridiculous as the British public in one of its periodical fits of morality.”

Free Standards group stabilises Linux for nervous businessmen

John Paczkowski, writing in today’s Good Morning Silicon Valley, says:

“In October of 2000, Microsoft ran what would be the first of many anti-Linux advertisements, one that, unlike the others that would follow it, was not only uncharacteristically witty, but rooted in the fears of the Open Source community, and not some alternate reality conjured up in a company sponsored study. Published in a German magazine, the ad featured a lineup of four penguins – the first a normal penguin, the second a penguin with rabbit ears, the third a penguin with a frog’s head and antlers, and the last a penguin with the ears of a pig and an elephant’s trunk. Microsoft’s point: Linux is forking in the same disastrous way that Unix did. Some day, there will many separate and incompatible versions of the OS and God help you if you’ve chosen to build a business on one of them. Nearly four years have passed since that ad first appeared and Linux has not forked in the way that Microsoft predicted. And after today, it probably never will. The Free Standards Group is expected to announce today that a consortium of companies — among them IBM, Intel, Hewlett-Packard, Dell, AMD, Red Hat and Novell — has agreed to support Linux Standard Base 2.0, a specification designed to assure compatibility between Linux distributions. It’s a landmark agreement and one that could do much to solidify Linux’s role as a desktop option. Said Jim Zemlin, executive director of the Free Standards Group: “If the Linux industry can unite and pull this off, there’s a real shot at a true open alternative to Microsoft. … As with any standard you must reach a certain critical mass to gain recognition. We’ve gained total support from the world’s Linux software makers and having these other vendors come lend their support goes a long way.”

Microsoft’s new mobile phone only needs three keys

Thanks to Tom’s friend Charlie, who saw it first.

Madness on boards

And in the midst of the howling gale, a windsurfer.

On the beach…

… near Haarlem today. There was a Force 6 gale, wonderful clouds scudding across the sky and perfect photographic lighting — sunlight filtered through cloud.

So why exactly did Bush disappear from the National Guard?

From Scott Rosenberg’s Blog…

“Now we have a flood of new jigsaw puzzle pieces, including this strange one from May 19, 1972, in which Bush’s Texas commander writes: “Physical. We talked about him getting his flight physical situation fixed before his date. Says he will do that in Alabama if he stays in flight status. He has this campaign to do and other things that will follow and may not have the time. I advised him of our investment in him and his commitment. He’s been working with staff to come up with options and identified a unit that may accept him. I told him I had to have written acceptance before he would be transferred, but think he’s also talking to someone upstairs.” Another memo records a direct order to Bush to take the physical.

Now, I’ll accept that young Bush was a busy guy, with political campaigns to run and parties to attend — but here he is, he’s been in the Guard for four years, what’s the big deal about a physical? How long does it take, an afternoon? Why was it so important to him not to undergo this routine procedure?

I’m afraid this is the sort of query that leads one toward that other swamp of evasion in the Bush record — those questions about his alleged drug use that have always been answered with nods, winks, comments about having been “young and irresponsible” and denials of drug use carrying carefully crafted expiration dates. Earlier this year, Boehlert reported on the strange coincidence that Bush’s Guard disappearing act almost exactly coincided with the institution of random drug testing for military personnel: ‘At the time when Bush, perhaps for the first time in his life, faced the prospect of a random drug test, his military records show he virtually disappeared, failing for at least one year to report for Guard duty.'”

Thanks to Gerard for the link.