The Da Vinci Code case

Nick Cohen has an interesting piece in today’s Observer.

Initially, he was indifferent about the outcome.

How much of The Da Vinci Code is – ahem – ‘borrowed’ from Holy Blood, Holy Grail is the subject of the plagiarism case at the High Court in London that enters what should be its final week tomorrow. ‘Too bad they can’t both lose,’ said Henry Kissinger about the Iran-Iraq War and I felt the same when I went to the court.

But, on reflection, Cohen alighted on a spot-on appreciation of the significance of the case for free culture.

David Hooper, a specialist in intellectual property, said the case was something new. The Holy Blood authors are not saying that Dan Brown had copied chunks of their work verbatim. Instead, they are suing him for taking some of their ideas, researching them, playing with them and turning them into a novel. If they win, Hooper believes a chill will go through cultural life as publishers face the next to impossible task of separating original thoughts from other people’s thoughts.

“I hate to be the one who has to say it”, Cohen concludes, “but Dan Brown needs to win. If he doesn’t, free thought may be stifled in the name of protecting ideas.”

Amen.

The madness of record labels

And I thought I was critical of the music industry. (Well, I am, in the sense that I think only the skills of a psychiatrist can explain how the industry failed to spot the opportunity offered by online music.) But here’s a rant that’s far more dismissive than anything I’ve managed to date. Sample:

It continues to astonish, but the recording industry STILL does not have a clue WTF they are doing. Utterly amazing.

A story in the NYT Thursday reveals that the actual levels of business knowledge and economic understanding that exists in the recording industry. The answer, it turns out, is nonewhatosever.

Proof for this revelation is what the RIAA braintrust now thinks is hurting CD sales: it’s legal digital downloading that is holding back CD sales. Not illegal P2P, as the RIAA likes to tell us, but legal sales!

Like I say, it needs a psychiatrist…

The significance of the Writely acquisitiion

More on Google’s acquisition of Writely, the web-based processing tool, about which I wrote briefly the other day. I’ve just come on an interesting (if slightly hyperbolic) essay describing the acquisition as Microsoft’s “Pearl Harbour”! I think that’s overblown, but it’s interesting to remember that Bill Gates chose Pearl Harbour Day way back in 1993 to alert his company to the threat posed by the Internet and Netscape.

The Road To Guantanamo

Here’s something really interesting that I’d missed — Michael Winterton’s film, The Road To Guantanamo, which was screened on Channel 4 the other night, was made available for immediate download over the Net. Cost: £4.99 to own; £2.99 to ‘rent’. This was a brilliant move — not just in demonstrating an alternative distribution channel, but also in enabling the film to be seen in countries which might otherwise not be given the chance to see it.

IBM will snub Vista

From The Inquirer

BIGGISH BLUE donned a Red Hat and said that it will not install Microsoft Vista into any of its corporate desktops and will continue its roll-out of Linux instead.

Speaking at a Linux Forum, IBM’s Open source and Linux technical sales bigwig Andreas Pleschek said that IBM has cancelled its contract with Microsoft as of October this year.

This means that Vista will not appear on any Big Blue desktops. Instead, from July IBM employees will begin using IBM Workplace on its brand spanking new, Red Hat-based platform.

Some users will remain on their old XP machines for a while, but none will be upgraded to Vista, said Pleschek.

Not clear if this is an IBM Germany decision on one that applies worldwide.

A frivolous query

One of my friends has just acquired a BlackBerry. I sent him a cheery greeting and then fell to wondering if a friendly message from one Crackberry user to another should be called a BlackBerry cordial. I only ask.

The early bird

I had a text message this morning from one of my sons explaining that the water in the Trafalgar Square fountains in London was running green. (Later, he sent me the above photograph.) It turns out that Mayor Ken Livingston is celebrating St. Patrick’s day a few days early (it falls on next Friday). There’s a parade, a screening of Irish films at the Barbican and the Mayor hosted a big dinner last night.

How times change. We’re accustomed to big celebrations of St Patrick’s day in the US — where the Irish-American diaspora wields huge economic and political power. But traditionally the Brits used to look down their noses at the Irish. In my lifetime there used to be notices in English boarding houses saying “No Blacks or Irish”. We supplied the manual labour that built British railways and motorways — and a good many post-war houses. Thirty years ago the idea of the city of London officially celebrating its Irish community would have provoked outrage (legitimated perhaps by IRA terrorism).

How things change. One of the ironies of Irish economic growth is the fact that English plasterers and bricklayers are now much in demand — building for my countrymen, in Ireland! Alongside Poles, Latvians, Lithuanians and others.

Later… More reports and photographs suggest a different interpretation. For example, this…

… suggests that corporate sponsorship (courtesy of that faux-Irish firm Guinness — which is in fact owned by Diageo) had a big hand in the festivities. And the idiotic get-up of other participants (Elvis O’Presley, for example) brings to mind Yeats’s great rebuke to a baying mob of Dublin philistines in the Abbey Theatre: “You have disgraced yourselves — again”. It’s the ‘again’ that I love.

For more pics, see Brian’s Flickr photostream.

Google sucks up to Wall Street

This morning’s Observer column

Google floated at $85 a share, which Wall Street saw as too high. Then the price began its apparently inexorable climb until January, when it reached $475 and some carpet-chewing stock-pickers began talking about $2,000 a share. The strategy of thumbing a nose at the Street seemed to be paying off, and the sainted duo could do no wrong. But then, finally, rationality intervened, the curve turned down and everything started to look different. There’s nothing quite like a falling share price to concentrate the analytical mind.

The turnaround also had a salutary effect on Google management. Gone was the aloof disdain for stockholders’ grubby obsession with short-term fluctuations in share price. In its place came an elaborate exercise in massaging the perceptions and expectations of analysts. In a series of high-level presentations, the Googlers explained that everything was hunky-dory, really; that they were on course for world domination and their rightful place in the sun as a $100bn company; that all that stuff about click-fraud was a storm in a teacup; and that they had tons of really cool stuff up their corporate sleeves…