Grocer dies

Edward Heath, forever known to Private Eye readers as “Grocer Heath” has died at the ripe old age of 89.

I spent a day with him once, during a general election campaign. He was then very much out of favour with a Tory party dominated by “that woman”, as he habitually referred to Margaret Thatcher, so Central Office tried to keep him out of the campaign. But he decided that he would go round the country on his own, supporting candidates of whom he approved. On the day I travelled with him, we visited seats in the North of England. At each venue, the routine was the same. There would be a press conference plus ‘photo opportunity’ for the local candidate, so that he could be pictured standing next to the Great Man. To enliven proceedings (because the press conferences were dire) I began asking the same question of each candidate. Did he, I wondered, consider himself as “belonging to the Heathite wing or the Thatcherite wing” of the Party?

The wriggling discomfiture of the candidates was hilarious to behold. On the one hand, they did not wish to embarrass the Great Man. On the other, they were terrified of upsetting Central Office. After I’d done this a couple of times, I noticed that the Grocer was enjoying the joke almost as much as I was. On the third occasion he muttered to me “You’re a sadist!”

Notes from a parallel universe

Greetings from a parallel universe. I refer, of course, to rural France, to which the Naughtons have temporarily decamped. I’m writing this sitting in front of the house we are renting from friends, after a modest lunch of baguettes, tomato and brie washed down with chilled white wine.

This is the view through our front gate.

The second pair of gates, over the road, leads into the garden that goes with the house. The only sounds are those of birds and, somewhere in the distance, the crowing of a cockerel (or should that be a coq?) Behind the house, the kids are swimming in the pool, or playing ping-pong, or feeding the pet sheep which come with the place. It’s unbelievably peaceful, and quite, quite beautiful. But it also has wireless broadband, via a satellite link, so the Middle Ages it ain’t.

Someone said once that the English middle classes regard France as one giant delicatessen. Well, I’m not English, so that lets me off the hook. But I love rural France, and the way the society takes food seriously. This morning we went to the market in Aulnay, and gaped — as we always do in French markets — at the quality and abundance of the fruit and vegetables on sale. Last night we ate Charente melons and drank champagne and a beautiful liqueur called Pineau which comes from a cave just down the road.

I love France because it allows one to escape the suffocating Anglo-American bubble in which Blair’s Britain now finds itself trapped. What annoys me most about that is the way its ideologues arrogantly maintain that there is no other reality — that American-style liberal capitalism is now the only possible reality.

Of course France has its problems, and the rural France that the Naughtons love is no doubt partly sustained by the European subsidies so anathema to Thatcher and Blair, but it seems to me that, as a society, the French strike a better balance between life and work. They are better tuned to the demands of nature and the weather. They are more civilised. In that sense, France genuinely resides in a parallel universe — as part of what Don ‘War Lite’ Rumsfeld sneeringly called ‘Old Europe’. Long may it continue that way.

Technological voyeurism

This morning’s Observer column on the ‘citizen reporting’ of the London bombings. Excerpt

I find it astonishing – not to say macabre – that virtually the first thing a lay person would do after escaping injury in an explosion in which dozens of other human beings are killed or maimed is to film or photograph the scene and then relay it to a broadcasting organisation.

Especially when one realises what was in this ‘amateur’ material. Some of the cameraphone video clips sent to ITV News, for example, were so graphic as to be ‘unusable’, according to the channel’s editor. I haven’t seen the clips, so can only imagine what they contained.But I can guess: images of human beings blown to pieces, missing limbs, intestines, perhaps even heads – sons, daughters, mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters whose privacy has been invaded in the most intrusive way, even as they lay dying.

I suppose there will be arguments about how this imagery and footage is justified because it conveys so vividly the horrors of which terrorists are capable. But I don’t buy it, and I don’t think broadcasting organisations should either.

I’ve had some feedback already from this, mainly from people saying that I shouldn’t blame the technology. I agree: the problem is what the technology reveals about human nature.