“No favours but slightly quicker”

“No favours but slightly quicker”

Nanny trouble strikes again: David Blunkett has resigned as home secretary after an e-mail emerged showing a visa application for his ex-lover’s nanny had been fast-tracked. The e-mail had said “no favours but slightly quicker”. Blunkett said he had not been aware of its contents and insisted he had done nothing wrong.

So what happened then? Did a civil servant send the email on her/his own authority? If so, shouldn’t s/he be sacked?

In the meantime, I can see the phrase “no favours but slightly quicker” entering the British comic lexicon — like “Up to a point, Lord Copper” (denoting total disagreement) from Evelyn Waugh’s novel, Scoop. Or Mandy Rice-Davies’s “Well, he would, wouldn’t he?” (Uttered while giving evidence at the trial of Stephen Ward when the prosecuting counsel pointed out that Viscount Astor had denied having met her.)

Kook of the Year!

Kook of the Year!

There’s a wonderful story on Slashdot about a crackpot who wrote a Wikipedia page about himself, only to have it, er, rendered more objective by other contributors. This then drove him wild, with predictable results. The current version of the page seems admirable to me, but it’s had to be locked to prevent further vandalism. Opponents of Wikipedia will doubtless try to use this story as evidence that an open project like this cannot work. To me, it proves the opposite.

Caligula’s horse — contd.

Caligula’s horse — contd.

“The story of Mr. Kerik’s nomination is one of how a normally careful White House faltered because of Mr. Bush’s personal enthusiasm for Mr. Kerik, a desire by the administration to quickly fill a critical national security job and an apparent lack of candor from Mr. Kerik himself.” [ New York Times .]

I like that bit about “a normally careful White House”. That would have been in, let me see…, Harry Truman’s time?

Google to digitize millions of books

Google to digitize millions of books

Many years ago, Howard Rheingold asked an interesting question. He was trying to get people to think about the possibilities of a world in which everything that was published was accessible on the Web. “Where is the Library of Congress”, he mused, “when it’s on your laptop?” In the old days, people had to come to the information. But one day it would be the other way round. Now it seems that day may be closer than we thought — thanks to Google.

Today’s Mercury News reports:

“Google is launching an ambitious effort to make digital copies of some of the world’s largest university library collections and will incorporate the texts into its vast Web index, apparently the largest project of its kind ever attempted.

As envisioned, almost anyone with a computer could instantly tap into enormous academic libraries — some with texts dating back centuries.

Stanford, Harvard and Oxford universities, as well as the University of Michigan and the New York Public Library, are participating in the program, which could span years and involve scanning and indexing well more than 10 million books and periodicals.”

One of the side effects of this project — as my friend Gerard points out — will be to reinforce the dominance of English as a global language. If I were the French government, I’d be negotiating with Google to digitise the contents of the Bibliotheque Nationale.

Kerik redux

Kerik redux

More on Bernard in today’s NYT. “In June 2000, two months before Bernard B. Kerik was appointed police commissioner, New York City’s top investigative agency learned that he had a social relationship with the owner of a New Jersey construction company suspected of having business ties to organized crime figures, city documents show. The city’s Department of Investigation took two days of testimony from Frank DiTommaso, the owner of the company, Interstate Industrial Corporation. It also formally interviewed Mr. Kerik himself.”

It goies without saying, of course, that “there is no indication that Mr. Kerik did anything illegal or improper”. Naturally. If there had been, surely St Rudolf [Guiliani] would never have appointed him New York’s Top Cop.

Wine online

Wine online

The US is such a strange country. You can buy guns freely, but I’ve just discovered that it’s illegal to sell alcohol over interstate boundaries. This is, as you might expect, acting as a damper on e-commerce in the wine business. It also conflicts with the Constitution’s endorsement of free trade. So the Supreme Court is going to consider the issue. Wine buffs await the outcome with bated breaths. So, presumeably, do small wineries.