Doc Searls’s reflections on the New Hampshire Primary result

Doc Searls’s reflections on the New Hampshire Primary result

I like Doc and have been reading him for years. Here’s a extract from his thoughts about the troubles of Dean and the rise of Kerry:

“Meanwhile, there’s the matter of … the constitutional crisis that should have happened after the last election, but didn’t. Big Media would rather forget about it, but the voters won’t let them.

I was delivered that realization last night when I talked on the phone with another friend. She’s a republican, a historian and an astute political observer. She reads a lot of blogs, but she also watches a lot of TV. After telling me that ABC pretty much “apologized” for tendentious reporting of the “Dean Scream” (I just saw Diane Sawyer do a huge mea culpa on Good Morning America, offering excerpts of the same from CNN and Fox… no useful links on the ABC News site, of course) she offered something of a Unified Field Theory that explained everything from ABC’s apology to Joe Trippi’s resignation to the unexpectedly large support for Kerry by voters primary states who favored Dean in the polls only a few weeks ago….

This is a recall election, she said. Dean isn’t the angry one. If you want anger, look to the voters. There is an enormous resolve out there to recall George W. Bush. As we’ve seen in California, the country likes the straight burboun of direct democracy. The representative system failed in the last presidential election. Regardless of who won, the process was an ugly and unfair mess. Now voters see a barely-elected president with delusions of empire, preparing to keep the country in perpetual war, spending trillions in money the government doesn’t have… Meanwhile the country appears headed toward a one-party state, thanks in large part to gerrymandering that deeply perverts the very principles of representative democracy. A second term for Bush will also guarantee a republican Supreme Court as well.

With all that writing on the wall, neither the voters nor the democratic machine cares as much about who started the recall as they do about the recall itself — just like we saw here in California, where the recall started by Ron Unz was finished by Arnold Schwarzenegger.

This indeed makes the primaries a referendum on electability. These voters are realists. Some of them use the Net, but all of them watch TV. If the TV wants to put Kerry in the ring, then Kerry’s the man, for better or worse.

If the counter-revolution will be televised, these voters say, then the revolution will be televised too. The job now is to get Kerry in condition.   Anyway, I kinda nodded along with all of this. It made sense to me. But the Net is still there, connecting voters in more ways than ever. And connecting governance as well.   The Net is the people’s medium. It’s where understanding is produced as well as consumed. In the long run the Net, and the people who use it best, will win.   I just hope I live to see it.”

Joe Trippi bows out

Joe Trippi bows out

Joe Trippi, enraged by Howard Dean’s recruitment of a Washington insider as CEO of his campaign, has resigned. In his place I’d have done the same. Watch Dean go downhill from now on. Nice ironic comment from Larry Lessig:

“From today’s NYT: You’re going to see a leaner, meaner organization,’ Dr. Dean, who has asked his 500 staff members to skip their paychecks for two weeks, told reporters on an 8 p.m. conference call. ‘We had really geared up for what we thought was going to be a front runner’s campaign. It’s not going to be a front-runner’s campaign. It’s going to be a long war of attrition. What we need is decision making that’s centralized.’

Yes, centralized. Fire someone who built the most extraordinary grass-roots organization in history, and hire a Washington lobbyist in his stead. Now we’re making progress…”

Hutton’s defects, contd.

Hutton’s defects, contd.

Terrific piece by Jonathan Freedland in today’s Guardian. Extract:

“For one thing, Lord Hutton seemed to have turned a deaf ear to crucial facts and testimony. Transcripts of interviews that the BBC Newsnight journalist Susan Watts had recorded with Dr Kelly corroborated much of what Gilligan claimed, not least the scientist’s statement that the 45-minute claim was “got out of all proportion”. But Lord Hutton appears to have put those transcripts out of his mind, preferring to assume that Dr Kelly could not have said what Gilligan claimed he had.

The judge further chose to believe there was no “underhand strategy” to name Dr Kelly, gliding over Mr Campbell’s diary entries in which he confessed his desperation to get the scientist’s name out. Lord Hutton concluded there was no leaking, even though newspaper reports from last summer show someone must have been pointing reporters very directly towards Dr Kelly.

He ruled there had been no meddling with the substance of the September dossier, just some beefing up of language, even though one expert witness, Dr Brian Jones, testified that, when it comes to intelligence, wording is substance.

On each element of the case before him, Lord Hutton gave the government the benefit of the doubt, opting for the interpretation that most favoured it, never countenancing the gloss that might benefit the BBC. Perhaps the clearest example was Lord Hutton’s very judge-like deconstruction of the “slang expression” sexed up. One meaning could be inserting items that are untrue, he said; another could simply be strengthening language. Under the latter definition, Hutton conceded, Gilligan’s story would be true. So his lordship decided the other meaning must apply….”