Good example of environmental-style rebuttal

Good example of environmental-style rebuttal

I’ve been arguing that the Internet community has much to learn from the environmental movement in the way it goes about winning hearts and minds and countering industrial land-grabs. Here’s a very good example of how to do it right — a one-page critique of the Hollings Bill which uses down to earth examples of how the Bill would bit on ordinary folks.

Internet Blamed for World Cup Tickets Fiasco – well, whaddya know

Internet Blamed for World Cup Tickets Fiasco – well, whaddya know

“Three internet sites on Wednesday appeared to be at fault over the swathes of empty seats at the soccer World Cup, which has spoiled the backdrop of the sport’s most important stage.

The Japanese site, www.jawoc.or.jp, Korean site, www.2002worldcupkorea.org and the international site www.fifatickets.com appeared to be overwhelmed by the number of people trying to buy last-minute tickets.

Yahoo, the US portal that is providing the technology and support for the official site of the 2002 Fifa World Cup, said that it was not responsible for the three sites selling tickets.” [ more…]

Ahem. I hate to spoil a good story, but surely it was the clowns who set up these sites who are responsible for the fiasco — not the Net.

Copyright thugs suffer a rare setback

Copyright thugs suffer a rare setback
“NYT” story.

“Hollywood studios seeking to impose electronic controls on digital television broadcasts suffered a setback yesterday as a coalition of technology and consumer electronics companies supporting their efforts crumbled in a cross-industry power struggle.

A long-awaited report that the studios hoped would provide the consensus necessary for anti-piracy legislation — and that members of Congress hoped would jump-start the stalled rollout of digital television — instead disclosed a host of dissenting opinions.”

Announcing: The RadioPoint Tool. “It turns the outliner into a presentation authoring program.”  [Scripting News]

Well, it depends on what you mean by a ‘presentation’. What Dave’s new tool does is enable you to compose your outline in Radio and then publish it on the Web. But a bulleted outline isn’t a presentation — it’s just an exercise in audience sight-reading. That’s the curse of PowerPoint — it allows speakers to put their words on to a screen, for the audience to read. This is an idiotic idea. My idea of a presentation is something that has no words at all — only pictures, photographs, movies, audio clips. The words are what the speaker utters, not what s/he flashes on to the screen.

I’ve been thinking about interactive TV for my column, and so started to look at the market research. Came on this, a perfect example of pusillanimous ‘research’. It sets out to ask the right question — “Does Interactive TV make sense?” — but manages to avoid giving the answer, even though the author clearly knows what it is. (“No”.)