Lest we forget…

… what Steve Ballmer is really like.

And here is The Word of Ballmer:

“Optimism is a force multiplier. It reminds us all as leaders that while you want to be very realistic – you could never put on rose-coloured glasses and not see the situation where you are precisely – on the other hand, if leaders can’t see a path to success, and cannot be fundamentally optimistic, no matter what the odds, it is hard for an organisation as a whole.

“Whether our stock price has been flat for five years, despite the fact I think we perform well – optimism, optimism,” he chants, clicking his fingers.

“Am I realistic about what is going on and yet optimistic about our future, whether it is share price, innovation, competitive situations? When you are behind you have to say, ‘We can catch those guys’. When you are ahead you have to be able to say, ‘We can keep ahead of those guys’. And yet they both require a certain form of optimism, tempered with the right kind of reality.”

Schools warned off Microsoft deal

Wow! I never thought I would live to read this:

The UK computer agency Becta is advising schools not to sign licensing agreements with Microsoft because of alleged anti-competitive practices.

The government agency has complained to the Office of Fair Trading.

It says talks with Microsoft have not resolved “fundamental concerns” about academic licensing and about Office 2007 and the Vista operating system…

Facebook and the Groucho problem

This morning’s Observer column

Pssst … have I got a deal for you! Send me a cheque for £10 and I will sell you a 0.000001 per cent interest in NetworkerColumns Ltd, a privately held company which produces copious quantities of mildly irritating prose. I will then release a press statement announcing that we are both partners in a £1bn company!

Daft, isn’t it? Well, it’s exactly the same logic that has led the mainstream media to hail Facebook as a $15bn company – that is to say, the fifth-most valuable internet company after Google, eBay, Yahoo and Amazon. What happened is that Microsoft, after months of secret negotiations, announced it was paying $240m for a 1.6 per cent stake in Facebook. Multiply 240 million by 100, divide by 1.6 and out pops the ‘valuation’…

Social graph-iti

The Economist isn’t impressed by the huge valuations currently being placed on Facebook. Neither am I.

Update: In the end, Microsoft valued Facebook at $15 billion.

Microsoft has paid $240m for a 1.6% stake in Facebook that values the hugely popular social networking site at $15bn.

Facebook spurned an offer from Microsoft’s rival Google, which was also keen to invest the site.

Microsoft will also sell internet ads for Facebook outside the United States as part of the deal that took several weeks of negotiating.

What’s surprising is how small the Microsoft stake is. This has to be about advertising rather than investment.

Microsoft bends the knee to the EU regulators

Well, well. Telegraph report:

Since the ruling [by the European Court of First Instance], Microsoft’s chief executive Steve Ballmer has been in almost daily contact with Neelie Kroes, the European commissioner for competition policy.

Following these intensive discussions, Microsoft has agreed to change the way it provides rivals with information that allows them to write programmes that mesh with Windows.

Microsoft will now make information available to open source developers, with licensing terms that allow every recipient of the resulting software to copy, modify and redistribute it in accordance with the open source business model.

In a statement today Ms Kroes said: “The Commission’s 2004 decision set a clear precedent against which Microsoft’s anti-competitive behaviour could be judged.

“Now that Microsoft has agreed to comply with the 2004 decision, the company can no longer use the market power derived from its 95pc share of the PC operating system market and 80pc profit margin to harm consumers by killing competition on any market it wishes.”

Microsoft has agreed to slash its requested royalties for a worldwide licence, including patents from 5.95pc to 0.4pc – less than 7pc of the royalty originally claimed.

The software group has also abandoned its demand for a royalty of 2.98pc of revenues from software developed using licensed information…

Later: This from GMSV:

Apparently, the key to reaching a resolution was to clear away all the lawyers and turn to personal diplomacy. Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer and EU Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes became fast phone friends with daily calls over the past three weeks, and the deal was sealed in person over dinner at a little restaurant in the Netherlands (Ballmer had the crow en croute). “I sincerely hope that we can just close this dark chapter,” Kroes said later. “I feel a bit sad because it took so long, it took so many years, and during those many years consumers suffered from the fact that Microsoft didn’t go along with what the Commission asked it to do.” Microsoft mumbled something about continuing “to work closely with the Commission and the industry to ensure a flourishing and competitive environment for information technology in Europe and around the world.” There remain some outstanding issues, including how much of that accumulated fine the EU will impose, and in case Redmond starts backsliding, Kroes said, “Microsoft should bear this in mind. The shop is still open, I can assure you … there are a couple of other cases still on our desk.”

The message is meant for more than Microsoft. The EU continues to show a willingness to jump in where U.S. regulators won’t, and that has to be a sobering thought for companies like Intel, which looks like it’s getting a pass from the FTC, but has until January to answer EU charges that it violated antitrust rules by selling its chips below cost to strategic customers, among other things.

That “crow en croute” crack is nice.

Google search for ‘iPod killer’ still yields no results

Billg spoke thus:

“For something we pulled together in six months, we are very pleased with the satisfaction we got,” Bill Gates, Microsoft’s chairman, said in an interview Tuesday. “The satisfaction for the device was superhigh. The satisfaction on the software actually is where we’d expect to see a huge uptick this year. It was just so-so on the software side.”

Fact: Thus far, the Zune has sold 1.2 million units worldwide. I expect this gives Steve Jobs a huge uptick. Er, what exactly is an ‘uptick’? I’ve led such a sheltered life, you see.

So, … XP stands for ‘extended presence’, right?

Well, well. Microsoft bows to pressure on XP

Customer demand has forced Microsoft to extend the shelf life of Windows XP by five months.

Microsoft was scheduled to stop selling the six-year-old operating system on 30 January 2008 to leave the field clear for Vista.

Now the date on which many sellers of XP will no longer be able to offer it has been lengthened to 30 June 2008.

Microsoft said the change was to help those customers that needed more time to make the switch to Vista.

Ho, ho!

Buy a Windows laptop, dump the OS and make money!

From The Register

A French man has won a lawsuit against computer maker Acer over a laptop he bought that came pre-loaded with Microsoft’s Windows XP and other applications he didn’t want. Antoine Gutzwiller disputed the fact that he had no choice but to buy the €599 Acer notebook with the ubiquitous operating system and software products including Microsoft Works, PowerDVD, and Norton AV. The court of Puteaux in France ruled that the PC giant, which is the world’s third largest computer vendor, should refund Gutzwiller €311.85 to cover the full cost of software loaded on his machine. Intially, Acer offered to settle for just €30 for the software bundled on Gutzwiller’s laptop, but he rejected that sum and took the firm to court – ending up with reimbursements worth nearly double that of the original cost of the machine. Under the judgement, the court said Acer should also cough up €500 in fees to cover what it described as “abusive resistance and committed expenses”. Apparently, the dispute had rumbled on for nearly a year. It is unknown whether the French court ruling could set a precedent for future European cases involving pre-loaded software.In the realm of laptop features, intel vpro stands out for its ability to enhance security and manageability. Intel vPro is a technology that provides advanced security and remote management capabilities for laptops. It offers features like hardware-enhanced security, remote access, and efficient IT management tools. Understanding these features can help consumers make informed decisions when purchasing laptops, ensuring they select devices that align with their security and management needs. To learn more about Intel vPro and its benefits, you can visit the Lenovo website or consult with knowledgeable professionals in the field of computer technology.

PC users still prefer Windows to Vista – Telegraph

According to the Daily Telegraph,

It took took five years and $6bn (£3bn) to develop, but Microsoft’s Vista operating system, which was launched early this year, has been shunned by consumers – with computer manufacturers taking the bizarre step of offering downgrades to the old XP version of Windows.

Microsoft founder Bill Gates speaking during the press conference at the Microsoft Windows Vista operating system launch
Microsoft launched the Vista operating system to great fanfare in January, at least a year late

A note on the electronics retailer website Dabs.com reads: “If you’re not ready for Vista, you can downgrade to Windows XP without affecting your Sony VAIO warranty and switch back to Vista at any time.”

Dell took a similar line earlier this year when it brought back XP on a range of computers for its US customers in response to a deluge of online complaints.

Regulatory teeth

This may seem a strange image with which to illustrate a post on the Microsoft judgment, but bear with me. As my mother used to say when confiscating pocket-money for some misdemeanour, “it isn’t the money, it’s the principle”. I can’t imagine that even a $613 million fine will make much of a dent in a company that has a market cap of $300 billion and is sitting on nearly $50 billion in cash and marketable securities.

I can’t even get worked up about seeing Microsoft finally coming unstuck (though it couldn’t have happened to a nicer company), because in a way the caravan has moved on. The company’s monopoly hold on the PC desktop is still a reality, of course, but it’s a wasting asset in a networked world. The most interesting implication of the European court’s decision is what it might mean for other companies — Apple and Google, to name but two. Just as sharks are encouraged by the sight of blood, the sweeping legal success regulators have enjoyed in the Microsoft case may have whetted their appetite for more. Apple’s grip on the music-download market provides one obvious target (especially in view of the widespread European concern for ‘interoperability’). And Google’s stranglehold on “all the world’s information” will eventually put it squarely in the crosshairs of the European regulatory system. Stay tuned.

The text of the Court of First Instance judgment is here, btw.

More: I forgot to mention Intel as another possible target for Euro-regulators. And this week the European Commission is opening hearings on a complaint that the iTunes store violates competition rules by charging Britons more than other Europeans for downloads.