Missing links

There are, it is said, only two golf stories. #1: I had a terrific drive but then screwed it up with a lousy second shot. #2 I hit a lousy drive but redeemed it with a terrific second shot. But actually there are lots of golf stories. For example, the one about the conscience-stricken bride who, on her wedding night, says to the groom that she has something to confess. “Before I met you”, she says, tearfully, “I used to be a hooker”. “Oh honey”, he replies, “that’s nothing. All you have to do is change your stance and tuck in your right arm on the downswing…”.

Golf is the only game I was ever hooked on. I played it more or less every day from the age of ten until I went to Cambridge at the age of 22, when I stopped after I discovered how expensive it would be — in both time and money — to play in the University golf club. By that stage, Carol and I had a baby son, and the idea of my being away for many weekends — not to mention for hours on end during weekday afternoons — was repugnant to our feminist souls, and so my clubs went into storage and have been used only on rare occasions ever since. But it’s still the only game that grabs my attention, and the only one that I will watch on TV. I always watch the US Masters, for example, and the British Open. And the Ryder Cup.

So it’s not surprising that my eye was caught by a lovely piece in last week’s New Yorker by David Owen, about the rediscovery of an ancient golf course at Askernish on the island of South Uist in the Outer Hebrides. The course was laid out over a century ago by Old Tom Morris, the founding father of modern golf who, in the 1860s won four of the first eight British Opens and became the head professional of the Royal and Ancient Golf Club of St Andrews and chief greenkeeper of the Old Course there which — as Mr Owen says — is “golf’s holiest ground”.

The article, alas, is not available online, but the New Yorker has put up a slideshow narrated by David Owen which nicely conveys a sense of what has been uncovered at Askernish, and captures something of the magic of a proper links course.

Non-golfers sometimes treat the terms ‘golf course’ and ‘links’ as synonymous, but they’re not. “Linksland”, explains Owen, “is a specific type of sandy, wind-sculpted coastal terrain — the word comes from the Old English word blinc, ‘rising ground’ — and in its authentic form it exists in only a few places on earth, the most famous of which are in Great Britain and Ireland”. Links are always dry — even in the depths of winter — because of the way water drains through the sandy base. So the ball always bounces on the fairway, and never ‘plugs’ in the way that it will on a sodden inland course. And because links are always, by definition, by the sea, to the challenges of the terrain must be added the complications of wind. If you learned to play golf — as I did — on a links, then you learned always to keep the ball as low as possible. The kind of high, pitching shot so characteristic of, say, those who play Augusta National in the Masters, would be suicidal in Askernish.

So for me the New Yorker piece rang lots of bells. It also reminded me of something I had known but had long forgotten — that Tom Morris had laid out my favourite course: Lahinch in Co. Clare on Ireland’s West coast.

The characteristic of a Morris course is that it is shaped by the landscape rather than — as with modern course design — imposed upon it by earthmoving equipment. As a game, golf was, in David Owen’s words,

“permanently shaped by the ground on which it was invented. Groomed fairways are the descendants of the well-grazed valleys between the old linksland dunes; bunkers began as sandy depressions worn through thin turf by livestock huddling against coastal gales; the first greens and teeing grounds were flattish, elevated areas whose relatively short grass — closely grazed by rabbits and other animals and stunted by the brutal weather — made them the logical places to begin and end holes.”

So some of the most celebrated golf holes in these islands owe their character “more to serendipity and the vicissitudes of animal husbandry than they do to picks and shovels, since in the early years course design was more nearly an act of imagination and discovery than of physical construction.”

As an example, Owen cites the fifth hole in Lahinch, a short Par Three of fiendish unplayability. As you stand on the tee the green is totally invisible because between you and it is a high dune on the top of which is a white stone which — allegedly — indicates the line to the current pin position.

“Take an extra club”, says the official guide,

“to ensure clearing the famous dune in front of the green. As a general rule, due to an optical illusion, the white stone marking the pin location is ‘off’ by 5-10 yards to the left of the actual pin location.”

The offending dune — as David Owen observes — is “a feature that almost any contemporary architect would have eliminated with a bulldozer”.

The village of Lahinch has been comprehensively ruined by the insane, tacky ‘development’ of the Celtic Tiger in its rampaging years. But the links remains a truly magical place. There is no more beautiful spot in the Western world on a late Summer evening, with the sun settling into the Atlantic behind you, than the Par Four twelfth, where — the official guide again — you have to “aim your tee shot 10 yards right of the [ruined] Castle in the distance”.

And as for the eighteenth, well… words fail me — almost.

Waiting for the Billionth Download

Fascinating analysis of the emerging software market spawned by the iPhone.

Over the next week, the iTunes App Store is set to record its billionth download, an impressive milestone given that it launched less than a year ago. Granted the actual usage of most apps is spotty. To mark the event, I’m updating a few charts that I produced for previous posts.

Slightly over 35,000 apps have appeared in the U.S. app store. Over 31,000 were available in the last week alone, about 78% of which were PAID apps:

The charts are interesting. Lovely piece of research.

New apps currently running at 1,500 a week. This is an astonishing change in the market for software.

The rise and rise of the NetBook

In the midst of a pot-boiling piece by Randall Stross in the NYT is this evocative quote:

“In 1983, the Compaq Portable weighed 28 pounds, more than enough to set one’s shoulder throbbing halfway down an airport concourse; it cost $2,995 for one floppy-drive or $3,950 for two.”

Gosh, I remember the Compaq portable. Some of us have one arm longer than the other as a result of that dratted machine.

Later on, I had a much neater Compaq — the Compaq 3. It proved to be a terrific workhorse. And relatively portable for the time.

The artist and the iPhone

Lovely FT.com piece about David Hockney.

He has drawn recent portraits with computer software, using a Wacom graphic tablet and tablet pen, producing inkjet prints that can be physically reworked by hand; these are the subject of next month’s London show Drawing Inside a Printing Machine. One depicting Celia’s granddaughters Lola, Tilly and Isabella – made while the girls watched a DVD on a baby-white chaise longue – has the snapshot spontaneity of a photograph but the fluid lines, a composition interrogating their relationship, and a nonchalant loveliness, characteristic of Hockney’s best portraits.

Tea is poured, and as Fitzherbert disappears briefly to walk Freddie, Hockney produces his newest tool, an iPhone. With a few deft strokes he draws the outline of a face with his finger, clicks a button to alter the thickness of the line, adds eyebrows, lips. Another button produces the peals of York Minster; then the thing becomes a mouth organ that Hockney pretends to play; next it emits sounds like a razor and he pretends to shave. “It’s better than a Blackberry, which is all about efficiency – for businessmen,” he says. “This has a sense of the absurd – so it’s true to life, for me.”

Worth reading in full if — like me — you enjoy Hockney’s work.

Thanks to Lorcan Dempsey for the link.

Life After Newspapers — and spelling

Just browsing this WashPost piece by Michael Kinsley when I came on this para.

It is tempting, but too easy, to say the problems of newspapers are their own fault. True enough, the industry missed a whole armada of boats. If newspapers had been smarter, or moved faster, they might have kept the classified ads. They might have invented social networking. But that’s all hindsight. I didn’t think of these things, nor did you. Judging from Tribune Co., for which I once worked, the typical newspaper executive is a bear of little brain. Until recently, little brain was needed. Even now, to say the newspaper industry has no problems that a busload of geniuses couldn’t solve is essentially saying that the industry’s problems are insoluable. Or at least insoluable without help.

Hmmm… Insoluable indeed. Maybe someone should donate a spell-checker to the poor impoverished Washington Post. But that reference to “a bear of little brain” comes from Winnie the Pooh, whose spelling — you will recall — was “good spelling but it wobbles”.

That aside, it’s a nice piece.

Random thoughts over morning coffee…

… is the heading on this lovely meditative post by Dave Winer. Here’s how it opens:

I’m writing this sitting in a cafe in Harvard Sq drinking coffee and enjoying the beginnning of the day. No newspaper to read, just my netbook, a net connection and my own thoughts.

Doc Searls likes to say that markets are conversations, but people are conversations too. I have no way of knowing for sure how it is for other people, but inside me is a constant back and forth chatter, with lots of different voices, each expressing opinions of minor and major events that take place all around us (i.e. me).

It’s all those different voices that come up with ideas, collaboratively — we’re like a 24 hour group brainstorming session…

Free speech? Only if you’re a charity.

Like many of my (ageing) contemporaries, I regularly get approached by conference organisers asking me to give ‘keynote’ addresses to their events. I’ve noticed a trend: the glossier and more upmarket the event, the less inclined the organisers are to offer a speaker’s fee. Guy Clapperton has noticed the same problem — and pointed me at this wonderful rant by Harlan Ellison.

My rule btw is that I will do stuff free for charities and non-profit educational or public-service events. Companies pay, preferably through the nose.

LATER: Bill Thompson pointed me at this. Same message. Eloquent in a different way.

Email 101

From the Nicci French Blog.

Although email has the word ‘mail’ in it, it’s not like a letter and although it’s sent over a telephone line, it’s not like a telephone call. What it’s more like is the postcard you send from holiday that you send to someone in the office which they then pin up on the wall. You don’t free-associate on a postcard about kneecapping your enemies. You don’t spread vicious gossip about close friends on a postcard. There are more appropriate channels for such things.

My own rule about my own emails is this: if there is anything that embarrass me if it were printed out, put on a giant poster and pasted up in Piccadilly Cirucs, then I cut it out.

Yep.