Well, whaddya know — the US Army is switching to Linux

Well, whaddya know — the US Army is switching to Linux

According to The Register, ‘the US Army has abandoned Windows and chosen Linux for a key component of its “Land Warrior” programme, according to a report in National Defense Magazine. The move, initially covering a personal computing and communications device termed the Commander’s Digital Assistant (CDA), follows the failure of the previous attempt at such a device in trials in February of this year, and is part of a move to make the device simpler and less breakable. According to program manager Lt Col Dave Gallop this is part of a broader move towards Linux by the US Army: “Evidence shows that Linux is more stable. We are moving in general to where the Army is going, to Linux-based OS.”‘

Amazon’s Really Big Idea

Amazon’s Really Big Idea

A searchable archive of all its books — where you can search the text. And there’s a prototype already working. See this report. Quote:

“Amazon’s new archive is more densely populated than the early Web was, but it’s still far from complete. With its 120,000 titles, the archive has about as many books as a big brick-and-mortar store. Still, this is plenty to create a familiar sensation of vertigo as an expansive new territory suddenly opens up.

The more specific the search, the more rewarding the experience. For instance, I’ve recently become interested in Boss Tweed, New York’s most famous pillager of public money. Manber types “Boss Tweed” into his search engine. Out pop a few books with Boss Tweed in the title. But the more intriguing results come from deep within books I never would have thought to check: A Confederacy of Dunces, by John Kennedy Toole; American Psycho, by Bret Easton Ellis; Forever: A Novel, by Pete Hamill. I immediately recognize the power of the archive to make connections hitherto unseen. As the number of searchable books increases, it will become possible to trace the appearance of people and events in published literature and to follow the most digressive pathways of our collective intellectual life.

From the Hamill reference, I link to a page in the afterword on which he cites books that influenced his portrait of Tweed. There, on the screen, is the cream of the research performed by a great metropolitan writer and editor. Some of the books Hamill recommends are out of print, but all are available either new or used on Amazon.

With persistence, serendipity and plenty of time in a library, I may have found these titles myself. The Amazon archive is dizzying not because it unearths books that would necessarily have languished in obscurity, but because it renders their contents instantly visible in response to a search. It allows quick query revisions, backtracking, and exploration. It provides a new form of map.”

Update: lovely piece by Steven Johnson on the implications of this.

RFID tags go to school

RFID tags go to school

If you think John Ashcroft and David Blunkett are bad, just wait until Radio Frequency Identification tags go mainstream. RFIDs are the next-generation bar code. A tag is a low-cost microchip outfitted with a tiny antenna that broadcasts an ID number to a reader unit. The reader searches a database for the number and finds the related file, which contains the tagged item’s description. Unlike bar codes, which must be manually scanned, RFID-tagged items can be read when they are in proximity to a reader unit, essentially scanning themselves.

Wired is running an interesting story about a school in Buffalo which has already deployed the technology as a pupil-monitoring system. “Principal Stillman”, it reports, “has gone whole-hog for radio-frequency technology, which his year-old Enterprise Charter School started using last month to record the time of day students arrive in the morning. In the next months, he plans to use RFID to track library loans, disciplinary records, cafeteria purchases and visits to the nurse’s office. Eventually he’d like to expand the system to track students’ punctuality (or lack thereof) for every class and to verify the time they get on and off school buses. ‘That way, we could confirm that Johnny Jones got off at Oak and Hurtle at 3:22,’ Stillman said. ‘All this relates to safety and keeping track of kids…. Eventually it will become a monitoring tool for us.'”

And of course we can put RFID tags on banknotes just to make sure that nobody’s laundering money. And..well, the sky’s the limit.

This stuff is going to happen — and MUCH sooner than people think. Industry, commerce and government think it’s the greatest thing since sliced bread and are already tooling up for it. In the UK, Tesco put RFID tags on Gillette Mach3 razor blades (apparently because they are a regularly shoplifted item.) RFID technology will enable a nightmarish world of fine-grain, total surveillance. George Orwell, where are you when we need you?

Concorde flies its last

Concorde flies its last

Concorde flew for the last time today. I know it’s a politically incorrect thing to say, but I there was something about the gas-guzzling, environment-wrecking machine that I loved. One of my nicest memories is of flying the Atlantic in it in 1990. Here’s what I wrote at the time. I wouldn’t change a word today.

The cost of spam

The cost of spam

A Pew Internet survey finds that spam is starting to hurt email and erode people’s trust in the Internet world. Press Release reads, in part:

“WASHINGTON (October 22, 2003) — The recent explosion of email spam is beginning to take its toll on the Internet world. A new nationwide survey shows that 25% of America’s email users say they are using email less because of spam. Within that group, most say that spam has reduced their overall use of email in a big way.

Further, more than half of email users say that spam has made them less trusting of email in general. One of their fears is that legitimate emails might be turned away by filters designed to stop spam. Another is that they’ll simply miss incoming email from friends, family, or colleagues amid the clutter of spam in their inboxes.

“People just love email, and it really bothers them that spam is ruining such a good thing,” said Deborah Fallows, Senior Research Fellow at the Pew Internet & American Life Project and author of the report. “People resent spam’s intrusions; they are angered by its deceptions; and they are offended by much of the truly disgusting content.”

Here are some other key figures from a national phone survey of 1,380 Internet users conducted by the Pew Internet Project in June. The survey has a margin of error of plus or minus three points:

* 75% of email users are bothered that they cant stop the flow of spam, no matter what they do
* 70% of email users say spam has made being online unpleasant or annoying.
* 55% of email users say they get so many unwanted email messages in their personal account that it’s hard to get to the ones they want
* 30% of email users are concerned that their filtering devices may block incoming email that is important to them.

Despite their dismay, most Internet users keep the issue of spam in perspective. For them, spam takes its place next to life’s other annoyances, like telemarketing calls. Further, many users believe they know how to behave in a spam-saturated environment. The most popular way of dealing with spam is to simply click “delete.” More than 2/3 have made a more aggressive move, clicking to “remove me” from future mailings, although many voice concern that doing so only leads to more spam.”

Good God! Amazon making profits!!!!

Good God! Amazon making profits!!!!

I always thought that Amazon was a work of genius (and indeed it has already parted me from a significant amount of my money), but somehow I never expected it to become like a normal company. Yet the NYT is saying that Amazon “yesterday reported its first profit outside of the fourth quarter, which includes the holiday season, as its strategy to reignite growth with lower prices continues to pay off. Amazon, which some investors wrote off as being on the brink of insolvency a few years ago, is now generating cash at a steady clip. Its low prices and increasing selection of goods from other merchants have accelerated its growth in North America. Its sales are still growing rapidly in Europe and Japan, but the pace of growth is slowing overseas, largely as a result of increased price-cutting and offers of free shipping in many countries.”

Microsoft Officescam 2003

Microsoft Officescam 2003

Here we go again. According to the NYT, Microsoft is planning to spend between $150 million and $200 million marketing the release of Office 2003. That’s five times as much as it spent on marketing Office XP two years ago. Now we all know that Microsoft sits on a mountain (over $40 billion) of cash, but even so…. What’s up?

Well, one reason for this hysterical marketing push might be that the boys at Redmond are worried about competition.

But which competition? Answer: two kinds. The first is from Open Source software — particularly from OpenOffice/StarOffice the free/cheap (respectively) office suite. The second — and possibly more threatening — is competition from earlier versions of Microsoft Office. After all, if a company is getting by perfectly well with boring ol’ Office 2000, why should it spend oodles of money upgrading to Office 2003? This could be a big threat to MS revenues in the future — the fact that its customers see no reason to upgrade to newer version of Redmond bloatware.

So what to do? One possible answer: a ‘feature’ called MO3, which is allegedly built into Office 2003. According to Michael Robertson, the colourful CEO and founder of Lindows.com (who has had his day in court with Microsoft and is therefore hardly an impartial source) “this code will give Microsoft the ability to change anything on your computer at anytime they wish with no notification to you…. Post 9/11, few people question actions taken under the guise of ‘improved security’ and this is how MO3 will be foisted onto computer users – as a feature to ‘make you safer.’ Computer users have understandably tired of the near daily worm and virus warnings, as well as the time-consuming patch process due to Microsoft’s lax software standards and its focusing not on building secure products, but products that secure its monopoly market positions. To improve the predicament which they’ve created, Microsoft is forcing consumers to accept MO3 embedded into every computer. Listen closely and you’ll hear Microsoft mouth pieces speak of “turning software into a service” which really means they will be changing the software on your computer whenever they feel like it. They will slowly limit your ability to run non-Microsoft software. They will restrict choices on your computer to only those products they approve. They will make changes which cripple other software programs or reduce their ability to interoperate with your computer so you will be forced to use exclusively Microsoft approved products.”

Robertson goes on to claim that MS have already embedded what he calls “the MO3 virus” into their XBOX game console. “They now have the power at anytime to change all existing Xboxes which connect to the Internet, and they are already misusing it. They have deleted files from users’ computers without their knowledge or permission. They have added software which has removed the ability to run competitor’s software. They have been changing users’ systems without their consent and notification. They will do the same on Microsoft Windows based computers once MO3 is installed.”

Hmmm… Wonder how much of this is true. What we do know is that Office 2003 won’t run on versions of Windows older than XP (or Win2K with Service Pack 3 installed). We also know that “the newest version of Office 2003 will have the ability to assign rights and privileges to office files. The Information Rights Management (IRM) technology requires a Windows Server 2003 running Windows Rights Management Services software to manage the restrictions. Users will have the ability to specify who has the rights to read, change, print or copy the document, and can set an expiration date.

The IRM tools will be included in the professional versions of all the various Office 2003 applications. However, the technology will not be backwards compatible, meaning that an Office 2003 document that makes use of IRM, will not be able to be opened by an earlier version of the Office software. However, Microsoft is also planning on providing a plug-in for IE that will give users the ability to view, print or forward the document, assuming they have the appropriate privileges. Even though there is already software on the market that allows users similar functions, Microsoft is hoping that by giving the users the ability to perform these lock down functions directly from the creating software, they can make it easier.” [Emphasis added.]