Ed Felten on the importance of open disclosure

Ed Felten on the importance of open disclosure

Ed commented on the bike-lock story. Now he’s been reflecting on the CBS ‘fake memos’ episode. His conclusions are the same as mine in the bike-lock saga. This is what he says:

“What’s true with CBS is true elsewhere in the security world. Disclosure teaches the public the truth about the situation at hand (in this case the memos), a benefit that shouldn’t be minimized. Even more important, disclosure deters future sloppiness — you can bet that CBS and others will be much more careful in the future. (You might think that the industry should police itself so that such deterrents aren’t necessary; but experience teaches otherwise.)

My sense is that it’s only the remote and mysterious nature, for most people, of cybersecurity that allows the anti-disclosure arguments to get traction. If people thought about most cybersecurity problems in the same way they think about the CBS memos, the cybersecurity disclosure argument would be much healthier.”

Comments are closed.